What is risk in clinical genetics? Designing and piloting tools to evaluate risk in clinical genetics using failure modes and effects analysis

Risk exists throughout medicine. Understanding health system pressure points permits implementation of controls for risk reduction. The literature lacks a systematic approach to risk evaluation in Clinical Genetics. We aimed to develop Clinical Genetics-specific risk assessment tools to prospectively monitor risk. A retrospective review of 115 cases with identified adverse events or near misses in Clinical Genetics in Ireland was used to design a process map to define the steps where risk occurs across the patient journey through clinical genetics. We piloted a clinical audit form using the process map to capture risk event frequency. The draft process map and audit form were trialled (2022-2023) in 5 other European clinical genetics centres for validity and usability, and 2 re-audited in 2024 to assess utility. Using narrative summaries from the case review, we modified the national health risk severity scoring for clinical genetics use. The design of the risk process map, risk frequency audit and severity assessment align with Failure Modes and Effect Analysis methodology. Adverse events occurred in >3% of appointments in 4 of 6 centres (range 0.8-20.3%). High frequency failure modes varied by centre and included consent, sample processing, and patient discussion. Re-audit results reflected interventions introduced since initial audit. We propose these tools provide a standardized approach to discussing systematic risk in clinical genetics, and can be used to prospectively monitor adverse events, allowing controls to be put in place, reducing risk, thereby improving quality of service.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
European Journal of Human Genetics
Published
2025-10-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41431-025-01961-3
Citations
1
Primary Topic
BRCA gene mutations in cancer
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.82
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

What is risk in clinical genetics? Designing and piloting tools to evaluate risk in clinical genetics using failure modes and effects analysis

A. Clark Griffin, Outi Kuismin, Helen Stewart, Gillian Rea et al.
1 citations
European Journal of Human Genetics
BRCA gene mutations in cancer
1.82
article

What is risk in clinical genetics? Designing and piloting tools to evaluate risk in clinical genetics using failure modes and effects analysis

A. Clark Griffin, Outi Kuismin, Helen Stewart, Gillian Rea, Alana Ward, Dominic P. Behan, Natasha Coen, Vicky McGrath, Jukka S. Moilanen, Sally Ann Lynch, Ioana Streață, Sheila King, Deborah M. Lambert, Marta Bertoli, David W. Butterly, Elaine Kilroe, Mari Bandiola
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Risk exists throughout medicine. Understanding health system pressure points permits implementation of controls for risk reduction. The literature lacks a systematic approach to risk evaluation in Clinical Genetics. We aimed to develop Clinical Genetics-specific risk assessment tools to prospectively monitor risk. A retrospective review of 115 cases with identified adverse events or near misses in Clinical Genetics in Ireland was used to design a process map to define the steps where risk occurs across the patient journey through clinical genetics. We piloted a clinical audit form using the process map to capture risk event frequency. The draft process map and audit form were trialled (2022-2023) in 5 other European clinical genetics centres for validity and usability, and 2 re-audited in 2024 to assess utility. Using narrative summaries from the case review, we modified the national health risk severity scoring for clinical genetics use. The design of the risk process map, risk frequency audit and severity assessment align with Failure Modes and Effect Analysis methodology. Adverse events occurred in >3% of appointments in 4 of 6 centres (range 0.8-20.3%). High frequency failure modes varied by centre and included consent, sample processing, and patient discussion. Re-audit results reflected interventions introduced since initial audit. We propose these tools provide a standardized approach to discussing systematic risk in clinical genetics, and can be used to prospectively monitor adverse events, allowing controls to be put in place, reducing risk, thereby improving quality of service.

European Journal of Human Genetics
University College Dublin (IE), United States Department of the Treasury (US), Centre for Human Genetics (GB), Oulu University Hospital (FI), Rotunda Hospital (IE), Enterprise Ireland (IE), University of Medicine and Pharmacy of Craiova (RO), Children's Health Ireland at Crumlin (IE), 22q11 Ireland (IE), Newcastle upon Tyne Hospital (GB), University of Glasgow (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
BRCA gene mutations in cancer
1.82
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.