Cost-Effectiveness of Single Versus Multiple Sessions of Physical Therapy for Adults With Spinal Disorders: An Economic Evaluation From a Pragmatic Randomized Controlled Trial

<b>OBJECTIVE:</b> To evaluate the cost-utility of a single session compared with multiple sessions of physical therapy care for adults with spinal disorders. <b>DESIGN:</b> Economic evaluation based on a pragmatic randomized controlled trial. <b>METHODS:</b> Patients with spinal disorders who were referred for a spinal surgery consultation and triaged as nonsurgical cases by an advanced practice physical therapist were randomized to either a single session of education and exercise prescription (n = 52) or multiple sessions (6 sessions) of a multimodal physical therapy intervention (n = 54). Patients answered questionnaires on the health care resources used and related costs, as well as the EuroQol 5-dimension 5-level questionnaire at baseline and at 6, 12, and 26 weeks. Total health care costs and quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) were calculated. A cost-utility analysis comparing both groups was conducted using an intention-to-treat approach with multiple imputation to handle missing data. Nonparametric bootstrapping with 1000 resamples was performed. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) was subsequently calculated. Sensitivity analyses were performed. <b>RESULTS:</b> Compared to the single-session group, the multiple-session group incurred a significantly higher total health care costs of CA$368 (95% confidence interval [CI], $327 to $412) and achieved an additional 0.013 QALY (95% CI, 0.009 to 0.018). The ICER for the multiple-session approach was CA$29 787 per QALY gained compared to the single-session approach. Excluding private costs leads to similar results, while the complete-case analysis suggested that the multiple-session approach was not cost-effective. <b>CONCLUSION:</b> A multiple-session approach may be considered cost-effective compared to a single session of physical therapy for adults with spinal disorders in an advanced practice physical therapy model of care. <i>J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2025;55(11):1-8. Epub 29 September 2025. doi:10.2519/jospt.2025.13468</i>.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Orthopaedic and Sports Physical Therapy
Published
2025-09-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.2519/jospt.2025.13468
Primary Topic
Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Cost-Effectiveness of Single Versus Multiple Sessions of Physical Therapy for Adults With Spinal Disorders: An Economic Evaluation From a Pragmatic Randomized Controlled Trial

Luc J. Hébert, Simon Lafrance, Jason R. Guertin, Kadija Perreault et al.
Journal of Orthopaedic and Sports Physical Therapy
Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
article

Cost-Effectiveness of Single Versus Multiple Sessions of Physical Therapy for Adults With Spinal Disorders: An Economic Evaluation From a Pragmatic Randomized Controlled Trial

Luc J. Hébert, Simon Lafrance, Jason R. Guertin, Kadija Perreault, Julio Fernandes, Brenna Bath, Shane LaRue, Debbie Feldman, Rose Gagnon, François Desmeules, Carlo Santaguida, Kednapa Thavorn
article en

Abstract

<b>OBJECTIVE:</b> To evaluate the cost-utility of a single session compared with multiple sessions of physical therapy care for adults with spinal disorders. <b>DESIGN:</b> Economic evaluation based on a pragmatic randomized controlled trial. <b>METHODS:</b> Patients with spinal disorders who were referred for a spinal surgery consultation and triaged as nonsurgical cases by an advanced practice physical therapist were randomized to either a single session of education and exercise prescription (n = 52) or multiple sessions (6 sessions) of a multimodal physical therapy intervention (n = 54). Patients answered questionnaires on the health care resources used and related costs, as well as the EuroQol 5-dimension 5-level questionnaire at baseline and at 6, 12, and 26 weeks. Total health care costs and quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) were calculated. A cost-utility analysis comparing both groups was conducted using an intention-to-treat approach with multiple imputation to handle missing data. Nonparametric bootstrapping with 1000 resamples was performed. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) was subsequently calculated. Sensitivity analyses were performed. <b>RESULTS:</b> Compared to the single-session group, the multiple-session group incurred a significantly higher total health care costs of CA$368 (95% confidence interval [CI], $327 to $412) and achieved an additional 0.013 QALY (95% CI, 0.009 to 0.018). The ICER for the multiple-session approach was CA$29 787 per QALY gained compared to the single-session approach. Excluding private costs leads to similar results, while the complete-case analysis suggested that the multiple-session approach was not cost-effective. <b>CONCLUSION:</b> A multiple-session approach may be considered cost-effective compared to a single session of physical therapy for adults with spinal disorders in an advanced practice physical therapy model of care. <i>J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2025;55(11):1-8. Epub 29 September 2025. doi:10.2519/jospt.2025.13468</i>.

Journal of Orthopaedic and Sports Physical TherapyVol. 55(11)
Openalex Percentile: Top 65%
Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.