Addressing Racial and Ethnic Health Equity in Systematic Reviews and Evidence-Based Guidelines: Overview and Background for the Series

Systematic reviews and other evidence synthesis products support clinical practice guidelines, policy and coverage decisions, and future research directions. These products can help promote health equity by examining why differences in outcomes exist, how underrepresentation or overrepresentation in the evidence affects generalizability, and how to address underlying societal sources of disparities. This article provides an overview of and background for a series of articles sponsored by the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality and the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation. The series focuses on racial and ethnic health equity as one approach to enhance the utility of systematic reviews in addressing inequities. Together, the articles in the series address what end users of systematic reviews, specifically guideline developers, have done thus far; how best to methodologically address racial health equity; and what steps to take next.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Annals of Internal Medicine
Published
2025-10-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.7326/annals-24-03989
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Meta-analysis and systematic reviews
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.20
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Addressing Racial and Ethnic Health Equity in Systematic Reviews and Evidence-Based Guidelines: Overview and Background for the Series

Jennifer S Lin, Elizabeth M. Webber, Vivian Welch, Meera Sushila Viswanathan et al.
3 citations
Annals of Internal Medicine
Meta-analysis and systematic reviews
4.20
article

Addressing Racial and Ethnic Health Equity in Systematic Reviews and Evidence-Based Guidelines: Overview and Background for the Series

Jennifer S Lin, Elizabeth M. Webber, Vivian Welch, Meera Sushila Viswanathan, Celia Fiordalisi, Rania Ali, Shazia Mehmood Siddique, Nila A Sathe
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Systematic reviews and other evidence synthesis products support clinical practice guidelines, policy and coverage decisions, and future research directions. These products can help promote health equity by examining why differences in outcomes exist, how underrepresentation or overrepresentation in the evidence affects generalizability, and how to address underlying societal sources of disparities. This article provides an overview of and background for a series of articles sponsored by the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality and the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation. The series focuses on racial and ethnic health equity as one approach to enhance the utility of systematic reviews in addressing inequities. Together, the articles in the series address what end users of systematic reviews, specifically guideline developers, have done thus far; how best to methodologically address racial health equity; and what steps to take next.

Annals of Internal MedicineVol. 178(11_Supplement)
ECRI Institute (US), RTI International (US), Kaiser Permanente Center for Health Research (US), City of Portland (US), Bruyère (CA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Meta-analysis and systematic reviews
4.20
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Addressing Racial and Ethnic Health Equity in Systematic Reviews and Evidence-Based Guidelines: Overview and Background for the Series — Jennifer S Lin, Elizabeth M. Webber, et al. · Annals of Internal Medicine (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS