Only shine the light where and when it is needed – the impact of light pollution

There is growing evidence that artificial light at night (ALAN) has an adverse effect on human health and ecology. Long-term global studies also show that the world is getting brighter at night. This technological advancement comes at a price to both humans and nocturnal species that share our planet. Light pollution is wasted energy when the world is in simultaneous climate, biodiversity and energy security crises. There are no known negative consequences of reducing light pollution. A vital next step is to make 'quick win' changes by following the basic principles of using light only where it is needed, in the right amount, in the right place, at the right time and with the right colour. We advocate for more research into the adverse effects of ALAN on human health to help drive these changes and allow people to make informed choices about how light is used at local, national and international levels.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Future Healthcare Journal
Published
2025-09-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fhj.2025.100470
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Impact of Light on Environment and Health
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.11
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Only shine the light where and when it is needed – the impact of light pollution

Duncan C. Thomas, John C. Barentine, Mario Motta
1 citations
Future Healthcare Journal
Impact of Light on Environment and Health
1.11
article

Only shine the light where and when it is needed – the impact of light pollution

Duncan C. Thomas, John C. Barentine, Mario Motta
article en
1 citations

Abstract

There is growing evidence that artificial light at night (ALAN) has an adverse effect on human health and ecology. Long-term global studies also show that the world is getting brighter at night. This technological advancement comes at a price to both humans and nocturnal species that share our planet. Light pollution is wasted energy when the world is in simultaneous climate, biodiversity and energy security crises. There are no known negative consequences of reducing light pollution. A vital next step is to make 'quick win' changes by following the basic principles of using light only where it is needed, in the right amount, in the right place, at the right time and with the right colour. We advocate for more research into the adverse effects of ALAN on human health to help drive these changes and allow people to make informed choices about how light is used at local, national and international levels.

Future Healthcare JournalVol. 12(4)
Tufts University (US), Community Link (US), University Hospitals Plymouth NHS Trust (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 18%
Impact of Light on Environment and Health
1.11
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.