Towards Fair Medical Risk Prediction Software
This article examines the role of fairness in software across diverse application contexts, with a particular emphasis on healthcare, and introduces the concept of algorithmic (individual) meta-fairness. We argue that attaining a high degree of fairness—under any interpretation of its meaning—necessitates higher-level consideration. We analyze the factors that may guide the choice of a fairness definition or bias metric depending on the context, and we propose a framework that additionally highlights quality criteria such as accountability, accuracy, and explainability, as these play a crucial role from the perspective of individual fairness. A detailed analysis of requirements and applications in healthcare forms the basis for the development of this framework. The framework is illustrated through two examples: (i) a specific application to a predictive model for reliable lower bounds of BRCA1/2 mutation probabilities using Dempster–Shafer theory, and (ii) a more conceptual application to digital, feature-oriented healthcare twins, with the focus on bias in communication and collaboration. Throughout the article, we present a curated selection of the relevant literature at the intersection of ethics, medicine, and modern digital society.
Authors
- Wolfram Luther (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1245-7628)
- Ekaterina Auer (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4059-3982)
Institutions
- Wismar University of Applied Sciences (DE)
- University of Duisburg-Essen (DE)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Future Internet
- Published
- 2025-10-27
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.3390/fi17110491
- Primary Topic
- Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00