The Effect of Different White Spot Lesion Treatments on the Enamel Microhardness—An In Vitro Pilot Study

<b>Background/Objectives:</b> Dental caries, one of the most common oral diseases worldwide, represents a major public health concern. Contemporary dentistry has established several non-invasive approaches and resin infiltration, as a micro-invasive path, in the treatment of white spot lesions (WSLs). This study aimed to evaluate the effect of different WSL treatments on enamel surface microhardness. <b>Materials and Methods:</b> Seventy-five intact human premolars extracted upon orthodontic indication and the demineralizing solution composed of acetic acid, monopotassium phosphate and calcium chloride with pH = 4.4 and exposure time 96 h were used. The samples were randomly divided into five groups (n = 15): I-intact enamel (control group); II-artificial white spot lesion; III-artificial WSL treated with fluoride varnish; IV-artificial WSL treated with casein phosphopeptide-amorphous calcium phosphate (CPP-ACP) paste; V-resin-infiltrated artificial WSL. The surface microhardness was determined using the Oliver-Pharr method and a spherical indenter (Shimadzu Indenter, Kyoto, Japan). One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by a Post Hoc test (Bonferroni) was used with a level of significance set at <i>p</i> < 0.05. <b>Results:</b> Resin-infiltrated white spot lesions showed comparable microhardness mean value as the control group: 68.23 (±21.45) and 63.57 (±18.89), respectively (<i>p</i> > 0.05). Also, resin infiltration increased enamel microhardness compared to WSL values, with a statistically significant difference (<i>p</i> < 0.05). Fluoride varnish and CPP-ACP treatment resulted in equivalent values (50.84 ± 14.35 and 50.99 ± 15.31, respectively). <b>Conclusions:</b> Different WSL treatments (fluoride varnish, CPP-ACP and resin infiltration) produced comparable enamel microhardness values. Among the tested agents, resin infiltration resulted in higher microhardness values, while fluoride varnish and CPP-ACP demonstrated equivalent outcomes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Dentistry Journal
Published
2025-10-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/dj13110496
Primary Topic
Dental Erosion and Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Effect of Different White Spot Lesion Treatments on the Enamel Microhardness—An In Vitro Pilot Study

Aleksandar Jakovljević, Milena Milanović, Dušan Kosanović, Maja Dimitrijević et al.
Dentistry Journal
Dental Erosion and Treatment
article

The Effect of Different White Spot Lesion Treatments on the Enamel Microhardness—An In Vitro Pilot Study

Aleksandar Jakovljević, Milena Milanović, Dušan Kosanović, Maja Dimitrijević, Zoran Mandinić, Miloš Vorkapić, Jelena Juloski, Miloš Beloica, Miloš Todorović, Miloš Petrović, Dragan Stanimirović
article en

Abstract

<b>Background/Objectives:</b> Dental caries, one of the most common oral diseases worldwide, represents a major public health concern. Contemporary dentistry has established several non-invasive approaches and resin infiltration, as a micro-invasive path, in the treatment of white spot lesions (WSLs). This study aimed to evaluate the effect of different WSL treatments on enamel surface microhardness. <b>Materials and Methods:</b> Seventy-five intact human premolars extracted upon orthodontic indication and the demineralizing solution composed of acetic acid, monopotassium phosphate and calcium chloride with pH = 4.4 and exposure time 96 h were used. The samples were randomly divided into five groups (n = 15): I-intact enamel (control group); II-artificial white spot lesion; III-artificial WSL treated with fluoride varnish; IV-artificial WSL treated with casein phosphopeptide-amorphous calcium phosphate (CPP-ACP) paste; V-resin-infiltrated artificial WSL. The surface microhardness was determined using the Oliver-Pharr method and a spherical indenter (Shimadzu Indenter, Kyoto, Japan). One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by a Post Hoc test (Bonferroni) was used with a level of significance set at <i>p</i> < 0.05. <b>Results:</b> Resin-infiltrated white spot lesions showed comparable microhardness mean value as the control group: 68.23 (±21.45) and 63.57 (±18.89), respectively (<i>p</i> > 0.05). Also, resin infiltration increased enamel microhardness compared to WSL values, with a statistically significant difference (<i>p</i> < 0.05). Fluoride varnish and CPP-ACP treatment resulted in equivalent values (50.84 ± 14.35 and 50.99 ± 15.31, respectively). <b>Conclusions:</b> Different WSL treatments (fluoride varnish, CPP-ACP and resin infiltration) produced comparable enamel microhardness values. Among the tested agents, resin infiltration resulted in higher microhardness values, while fluoride varnish and CPP-ACP demonstrated equivalent outcomes.

Dentistry JournalVol. 13(11)
University of Belgrade (RS)
Openalex Percentile: Top 68%
Dental Erosion and Treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.