Intersectionality-In-Action: A Systematic Literature Review on Intersectional Praxis in HRD

Although intersectionality has gained attention in organizational studies over the past 15 years, limited understanding exists of how Human Resource Development (HRD)’s three pillars—Training and Development (TD), Organization Development (OD), and Career Development (CD)—have been practiced from an intersectional lens. To address the gap, this study aims to investigate how the principles of intersectionality have been applied to the three pillars of HRD by pursuing two objectives: analyzing how intersectional praxis has been enacted and identifying opportunities for advancing critical HRD scholarship. Guided by these objectives, we asked: (a) How have organization studies examined intersectional HRD praxis? (b) How has intersectionality been enacted into the three pillars? (c) How can HRD professionals relate, learn, change, and organize HRD praxis in intersectional ways? Using PRISMA guidelines, we systematically reviewed 108 empirical studies on intersectional HRD praxis and propose future directions to inform equitable and inclusive HRD research and practice.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Human Resource Development Review
Published
2025-10-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/15344843251392111
Primary Topic
Human Resource Development and Performance Evaluation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Intersectionality-In-Action: A Systematic Literature Review on Intersectional Praxis in HRD

Eunbi Sim, Nicole Dillard
Human Resource Development Review
Human Resource Development and Performance Evaluation
article

Intersectionality-In-Action: A Systematic Literature Review on Intersectional Praxis in HRD

Eunbi Sim, Nicole Dillard
article en

Abstract

Although intersectionality has gained attention in organizational studies over the past 15 years, limited understanding exists of how Human Resource Development (HRD)’s three pillars—Training and Development (TD), Organization Development (OD), and Career Development (CD)—have been practiced from an intersectional lens. To address the gap, this study aims to investigate how the principles of intersectionality have been applied to the three pillars of HRD by pursuing two objectives: analyzing how intersectional praxis has been enacted and identifying opportunities for advancing critical HRD scholarship. Guided by these objectives, we asked: (a) How have organization studies examined intersectional HRD praxis? (b) How has intersectionality been enacted into the three pillars? (c) How can HRD professionals relate, learn, change, and organize HRD praxis in intersectional ways? Using PRISMA guidelines, we systematically reviewed 108 empirical studies on intersectional HRD praxis and propose future directions to inform equitable and inclusive HRD research and practice.

Human Resource Development Review
Boise State University (US), University of Minnesota (US), Twin Cities Orthopedics (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 65%
Human Resource Development and Performance Evaluation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.