Hearing diversity and inequality of emergency services: perspectives on greater societal inclusion for deaf populations

Purpose We seek to investigate: (1) Where are the perceived gaps or inequalities in emergency services for the deaf populations? (2) How do perspectives on these inequalities differ across deaf populations and emergency service providers? Design/methodology/approach We conducted three focus groups: two composed of deaf and hard-of-hearing (DHH) persons, and one composed of emergency service providers, with discussions recorded, transcribed and then thematically coded. Themes were compared across different groups. Findings We found evidence of communication and accommodation needs among DHH persons during emergencies. Emergency response professionals, however, may not fully understand the lived experience of DHH persons and may not have the training and resources needed to always provide accessible service, leading to serious inequality in emergency services provided to the DHH community. Originality/value We are among the first to examine differing perspectives on gaps in emergency services for the DHH, extending disability management literature to external stakeholders and contributing to emergency policy research by highlighting perceptual differences between service providers, who act as street-level bureaucrats interpreting FEMA’s Whole Community Approach, and DHH communities.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Equality Diversity and Inclusion An International Journal
Published
2025-10-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1108/edi-07-2024-0305
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Hearing Impairment and Communication
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.44
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Hearing diversity and inequality of emergency services: perspectives on greater societal inclusion for deaf populations

Brian Tomaszewski, Jason Rotoli, David Baldridge, Sandra L. Rothenberg et al.
1 citations
Equality Diversity and Inclusion An International Journal
Hearing Impairment and Communication
3.44
article

Hearing diversity and inequality of emergency services: perspectives on greater societal inclusion for deaf populations

Brian Tomaszewski, Jason Rotoli, David Baldridge, Sandra L. Rothenberg, Lee Smith, Qing Miao, Iskender Mambetkadyrov, James Fugate
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Purpose We seek to investigate: (1) Where are the perceived gaps or inequalities in emergency services for the deaf populations? (2) How do perspectives on these inequalities differ across deaf populations and emergency service providers? Design/methodology/approach We conducted three focus groups: two composed of deaf and hard-of-hearing (DHH) persons, and one composed of emergency service providers, with discussions recorded, transcribed and then thematically coded. Themes were compared across different groups. Findings We found evidence of communication and accommodation needs among DHH persons during emergencies. Emergency response professionals, however, may not fully understand the lived experience of DHH persons and may not have the training and resources needed to always provide accessible service, leading to serious inequality in emergency services provided to the DHH community. Originality/value We are among the first to examine differing perspectives on gaps in emergency services for the DHH, extending disability management literature to external stakeholders and contributing to emergency policy research by highlighting perceptual differences between service providers, who act as street-level bureaucrats interpreting FEMA’s Whole Community Approach, and DHH communities.

Equality Diversity and Inclusion An International Journal
Oregon State University (US), Rochester Institute of Technology (US), University of Rochester Medical Center (US), Geographical Institute (HU), Individual Differences (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Hearing Impairment and Communication
3.44
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.