Test–Retest Reliability of Multi‐Metabolite Edited <scp>MRS</scp> at <scp>3T</scp> Using <scp>PRESS</scp> and <scp>sLASER</scp>

sLASER yielded better test-retest reliability than PRESS for most metabolites than for multi-metabolite edited MRS.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Magnetic Resonance in Medicine
Published
2025-10-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/mrm.70161
Primary Topic
Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Test–Retest Reliability of Multi‐Metabolite Edited MRS at 3T Using PRESS and sLASER

Ralph Noeske, Amy E. Bouchard, Dikoma C. Shungu, Jessica Archibald et al.
Magnetic Resonance in Medicine
Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications
article

Test–Retest Reliability of Multi‐Metabolite Edited MRS at 3T Using PRESS and sLASER

Ralph Noeske, Amy E. Bouchard, Dikoma C. Shungu, Jessica Archibald, Mark E. Mikkelsen
article en

Abstract

sLASER yielded better test-retest reliability than PRESS for most metabolites than for multi-metabolite edited MRS.

Magnetic Resonance in MedicineVol. 95(3)
Cornell University (US), Siemens Healthineers (Germany) (DE), Weill Cornell Medicine (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 54%
Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.