A Nutritional Evaluation of Plant-Based Meat and Sausage Analogues

Plant-based meat and sausage analogues (PBMAs) are gaining popularity due to growing concerns about the health, environmental, and ethical impacts of animal-based foods. In the present study, we compared the nutritional quality of 298 PBMAs to 294 animal-based reference products available on the German retail market in 2024 across nine subcategories. PBMAs generally contained less total fat, saturated fat, and protein, but more fibre, carbohydrates, and sugar compared to meat products. Notably, most meat analogues exhibited higher salt contents. Nutri-Scores of PBMAs were significantly favourable in six subcategories. Among PBMAs, approximately 60% demonstrated good protein quality, while only 12% were fortified with key micronutrients, including vitamin B12 or iron. Most PBMAs contained one or more additives and flavourings. These findings suggest that while PBMAs often offer favourable nutritional profiles, reformulation and clearer nutritional guidance could help to further support the emergence of healthier plant-based options.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Foods
Published
2025-10-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/foods14213674
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Agriculture Sustainability and Environmental Impact
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.72
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Nutritional Evaluation of Plant-Based Meat and Sausage Analogues

Anja Bosy‐Westphal, Gerald Rimbach, Katharina Jans, Mario Hasler et al.
1 citations
Foods
Agriculture Sustainability and Environmental Impact
1.72
article

A Nutritional Evaluation of Plant-Based Meat and Sausage Analogues

Anja Bosy‐Westphal, Gerald Rimbach, Katharina Jans, Mario Hasler, Ulrike Seidel, Leah Brodersen, Pia Rinne
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Plant-based meat and sausage analogues (PBMAs) are gaining popularity due to growing concerns about the health, environmental, and ethical impacts of animal-based foods. In the present study, we compared the nutritional quality of 298 PBMAs to 294 animal-based reference products available on the German retail market in 2024 across nine subcategories. PBMAs generally contained less total fat, saturated fat, and protein, but more fibre, carbohydrates, and sugar compared to meat products. Notably, most meat analogues exhibited higher salt contents. Nutri-Scores of PBMAs were significantly favourable in six subcategories. Among PBMAs, approximately 60% demonstrated good protein quality, while only 12% were fortified with key micronutrients, including vitamin B12 or iron. Most PBMAs contained one or more additives and flavourings. These findings suggest that while PBMAs often offer favourable nutritional profiles, reformulation and clearer nutritional guidance could help to further support the emergence of healthier plant-based options.

FoodsVol. 14(21)
Christian-Albrechts-Universität zu Kiel (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 13%
Agriculture Sustainability and Environmental Impact
1.72
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

A Nutritional Evaluation of Plant-Based Meat and Sausage Analogues — Anja Bosy‐Westphal, Gerald Rimbach, et al. · Foods (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS