Comparing human and AI translation: Lexical diversity, structural patterns, and semantic fidelity in L2 learners’ texts

This study investigates the differences between translations produced by novice L2 writers and AI systems in terms of lexical diversity, structural patterns, and semantic fidelity. Drawing on a corpus of 100 translations by Korean university students and outputs from three AI platforms, the research analyzes a Korean newspaper article on the dual nature of parody using a mixed-methods approach. The findings reveal that while student translations exhibit emotional depth and interpretive creativity, they often struggle with semantic precision and cohesion. In contrast, AI-generated translations are more concise, structurally coherent, and semantically faithful—but frequently lack cultural sensitivity and nuance. These contrasts highlight the potential of AI to support language learning while reinforcing the irreplaceable value of human insight in culturally rich translation tasks. The study advocates for integrative translation pedagogy, where human and AI strengths complement each other in academic settings.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
The Journal of Linguistics Science
Published
2025-09-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.21296/jls.2025.09.114.453
Primary Topic
Translation Studies and Practices
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparing human and AI translation: Lexical diversity, structural patterns, and semantic fidelity in L2 learners’ texts

Juhyun Back
The Journal of Linguistics Science
Translation Studies and Practices
article

Comparing human and AI translation: Lexical diversity, structural patterns, and semantic fidelity in L2 learners’ texts

Juhyun Back
article en

Abstract

This study investigates the differences between translations produced by novice L2 writers and AI systems in terms of lexical diversity, structural patterns, and semantic fidelity. Drawing on a corpus of 100 translations by Korean university students and outputs from three AI platforms, the research analyzes a Korean newspaper article on the dual nature of parody using a mixed-methods approach. The findings reveal that while student translations exhibit emotional depth and interpretive creativity, they often struggle with semantic precision and cohesion. In contrast, AI-generated translations are more concise, structurally coherent, and semantically faithful—but frequently lack cultural sensitivity and nuance. These contrasts highlight the potential of AI to support language learning while reinforcing the irreplaceable value of human insight in culturally rich translation tasks. The study advocates for integrative translation pedagogy, where human and AI strengths complement each other in academic settings.

The Journal of Linguistics ScienceVol. 114
Openalex Percentile: Top 61%
Translation Studies and Practices
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.