Framework for the Verification of Geometric Digital Twins: Application in a University Environment

Digital Twins rely on accurate geometric models to ensure reliable representation, yet maintaining and updating these models remains a persistent challenge. This paper addresses one aspect of this challenge by focusing on the verification of photogrammetry-based models. It introduces a verification framework that defines measurable data quality elements and establishes conditions to assess whether model quality is maintained, improved, or degraded. Validation through a university building case study demonstrates the framework’s ability to detect quality differences between visually similar models. Meeting only one of the three verification conditions, the new model shows quality degradation, primarily due to reduced positional accuracy and resolution, making it unsuitable to replace the previous version used in the Digital Twin. Additionally, the developed web tool prototype enables the automated calculation of the framework’s verification scores. This study contributes to the growing discussion on Digital Twin maintenance by providing practical insights for improving the reliability of geometric models.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Buildings
Published
2025-10-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings15213854
Primary Topic
3D Surveying and Cultural Heritage
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Framework for the Verification of Geometric Digital Twins: Application in a University Environment

Darius Pupeikis, Iryna Osadcha, Jaime B. Fernandez, Muhammad Intizar Ali et al.
Buildings
3D Surveying and Cultural Heritage
article

Framework for the Verification of Geometric Digital Twins: Application in a University Environment

Darius Pupeikis, Iryna Osadcha, Jaime B. Fernandez, Muhammad Intizar Ali, Vytautas Bocullo, Andrius Jurelionis
article en

Abstract

Digital Twins rely on accurate geometric models to ensure reliable representation, yet maintaining and updating these models remains a persistent challenge. This paper addresses one aspect of this challenge by focusing on the verification of photogrammetry-based models. It introduces a verification framework that defines measurable data quality elements and establishes conditions to assess whether model quality is maintained, improved, or degraded. Validation through a university building case study demonstrates the framework’s ability to detect quality differences between visually similar models. Meeting only one of the three verification conditions, the new model shows quality degradation, primarily due to reduced positional accuracy and resolution, making it unsuitable to replace the previous version used in the Digital Twin. Additionally, the developed web tool prototype enables the automated calculation of the framework’s verification scores. This study contributes to the growing discussion on Digital Twin maintenance by providing practical insights for improving the reliability of geometric models.

BuildingsVol. 15(21)
Kaunas University of Technology (LT), Dublin City University (IE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 57%
3D Surveying and Cultural Heritage
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.