Integrated Exhaled VOC and Clinical Biomarker Profiling for Predicting Bronchodilator Responsiveness in Asthma and COPD Patients

<b>Background:</b> Asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) are prevalent obstructive lung diseases with distinct inflammatory pathways but overlapping clinical features. Bronchodilator responsiveness (BDR) is a key diagnostic criterion, yet its metabolic determinants are poorly understood. <b>Objective:</b> This cross-sectional study investigated whether integrated profiling of exhaled volatile organic compounds (VOCs) and clinical biomarkers can differentiate BA, COPD, and health, and predict BDR. <b>Methods:</b> Exhaled breath from 160 BA patients, 128 COPD patients, and 254 healthy controls was analyzed in real-time using proton-transfer reaction time-of-flight mass spectrometry (PTR-TOF-MS) during tidal and forced expiration. Clinical assessment included spirometry, fractional exhaled nitric oxide (FeNO), blood eosinophil count, and total IgE. Machine-learning (XGBoost) was employed for feature selection and model development. <b>Results:</b> Distinct VOC signatures effectively discriminated disease groups from controls and from each other. The model for distinguishing asthma from healthy controls achieved an AUC of 0.747 during normal quiet breathing and 0.710 during forced exhale. For discriminating COPD from healthy controls, the model performance was higher, with an AUC of 0.821 for normal quiet breathing and 0.856 for forced exhale. A model integrating VOC profiles with clinical biomarkers (FeNO, eosinophils, IgE) demonstrated very high accuracy in internal validation in predicting BDR (AUC = 1.000 for tidal breathing; AUC = 0.970 for forced expiration). Specific mass spectral features (<i>m</i>/<i>z</i> 79, <i>m</i>/<i>z</i> 101) were significantly associated with a positive BDR test. <b>Conclusions:</b> This study delineates disease-specific VOC signatures and underscores the profound synergy between exhaled metabolomics and clinical immunology for identifying associations treatment response, advocating for the integration of real-time breath analysis into personalized management strategies for obstructive lung diseases.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Diagnostics
Published
2025-10-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics15212738
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Advanced Chemical Sensor Technologies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.35
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Integrated Exhaled VOC and Clinical Biomarker Profiling for Predicting Bronchodilator Responsiveness in Asthma and COPD Patients

Sergey Nikolaevich Avdeev, Artemiy Silantyev, F. Yu. Kopylov, Daria Gognieva et al.
2 citations
Diagnostics
Advanced Chemical Sensor Technologies
1.35
article

Integrated Exhaled VOC and Clinical Biomarker Profiling for Predicting Bronchodilator Responsiveness in Asthma and COPD Patients

Sergey Nikolaevich Avdeev, Artemiy Silantyev, F. Yu. Kopylov, Daria Gognieva, Olga Suvorova, А. Yu. Suvorov, Maria Vergun, Alexander V. Cherniak, A. E. Shmidt, В. Б. Бетелин, Malika Mustafina, А.А. Гордеева
article en
2 citations

Abstract

<b>Background:</b> Asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) are prevalent obstructive lung diseases with distinct inflammatory pathways but overlapping clinical features. Bronchodilator responsiveness (BDR) is a key diagnostic criterion, yet its metabolic determinants are poorly understood. <b>Objective:</b> This cross-sectional study investigated whether integrated profiling of exhaled volatile organic compounds (VOCs) and clinical biomarkers can differentiate BA, COPD, and health, and predict BDR. <b>Methods:</b> Exhaled breath from 160 BA patients, 128 COPD patients, and 254 healthy controls was analyzed in real-time using proton-transfer reaction time-of-flight mass spectrometry (PTR-TOF-MS) during tidal and forced expiration. Clinical assessment included spirometry, fractional exhaled nitric oxide (FeNO), blood eosinophil count, and total IgE. Machine-learning (XGBoost) was employed for feature selection and model development. <b>Results:</b> Distinct VOC signatures effectively discriminated disease groups from controls and from each other. The model for distinguishing asthma from healthy controls achieved an AUC of 0.747 during normal quiet breathing and 0.710 during forced exhale. For discriminating COPD from healthy controls, the model performance was higher, with an AUC of 0.821 for normal quiet breathing and 0.856 for forced exhale. A model integrating VOC profiles with clinical biomarkers (FeNO, eosinophils, IgE) demonstrated very high accuracy in internal validation in predicting BDR (AUC = 1.000 for tidal breathing; AUC = 0.970 for forced expiration). Specific mass spectral features (<i>m</i>/<i>z</i> 79, <i>m</i>/<i>z</i> 101) were significantly associated with a positive BDR test. <b>Conclusions:</b> This study delineates disease-specific VOC signatures and underscores the profound synergy between exhaled metabolomics and clinical immunology for identifying associations treatment response, advocating for the integration of real-time breath analysis into personalized management strategies for obstructive lung diseases.

DiagnosticsVol. 15(21)
Russian Academy of Sciences (RU), Sechenov University (RU), Institute for Systems Analysis (RU), Federal Medical-Biological Agency (RU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 17%
Advanced Chemical Sensor Technologies
1.35
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.