Decoding Construction Accident Causality: A Decade of Textual Reports Analyzed

Analyzing accident reports to absorb past experiences is crucial for construction site safety. Current methods of processing textual accident reports are time-consuming and labor-intensive. This research applied the LDA topic model to analyze construction accident reports, successfully identifying five main types of accidents: Falls from Height (23.5%), Struck-by and Contact Injuries (22.4%), Slips, Trips, and Falls (21.8%), Hot Work & Vehicle Hazards (18.1%), and Lifting and Machinery Accidents (14.2%). By mining the rich contextual details within unstructured textual descriptions, this research revealed that environmental factors constituted the most prevalent category of contributing causes, followed by human factors. Further analysis traced the root causes to deficiencies in management systems, particularly poor task planning and inadequate training. The LDA model demonstrated superior effectiveness in extracting interpretable topics directly mappable to engineering knowledge and uncovering these latent factors from large-scale, decade-spanning textual data at low computational cost. The findings offer transformative perspectives for improving construction site safety by prioritizing environmental control and management system enhancement. The main theoretical contributions of this research are threefold. First, it demonstrates the efficacy of LDA topic modeling as a powerful tool for extracting interpretable and actionable knowledge from large-scale, unstructured textual safety data, aligning with the growing interest in data-driven safety management in the construction sector. Second, it provides large-scale, empirical evidence that challenges the traditional dogma of “human factor dominance” by systematically quantifying the critical role of environmental and managerial root causes. Third, it presents a transparent, data-driven protocol for transitioning from topic identification to causal analysis, moving from assertion to evidence. Future work should focus on integrating multi-dimensional data for comprehensive accident analysis.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Buildings
Published
2025-10-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings15213859
Primary Topic
Occupational Health and Safety Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Decoding Construction Accident Causality: A Decade of Textual Reports Analyzed

Patrick X.W. Zou, Yuelin Wang
Buildings
Occupational Health and Safety Research
article

Decoding Construction Accident Causality: A Decade of Textual Reports Analyzed

Patrick X.W. Zou, Yuelin Wang
article en

Abstract

Analyzing accident reports to absorb past experiences is crucial for construction site safety. Current methods of processing textual accident reports are time-consuming and labor-intensive. This research applied the LDA topic model to analyze construction accident reports, successfully identifying five main types of accidents: Falls from Height (23.5%), Struck-by and Contact Injuries (22.4%), Slips, Trips, and Falls (21.8%), Hot Work & Vehicle Hazards (18.1%), and Lifting and Machinery Accidents (14.2%). By mining the rich contextual details within unstructured textual descriptions, this research revealed that environmental factors constituted the most prevalent category of contributing causes, followed by human factors. Further analysis traced the root causes to deficiencies in management systems, particularly poor task planning and inadequate training. The LDA model demonstrated superior effectiveness in extracting interpretable topics directly mappable to engineering knowledge and uncovering these latent factors from large-scale, decade-spanning textual data at low computational cost. The findings offer transformative perspectives for improving construction site safety by prioritizing environmental control and management system enhancement. The main theoretical contributions of this research are threefold. First, it demonstrates the efficacy of LDA topic modeling as a powerful tool for extracting interpretable and actionable knowledge from large-scale, unstructured textual safety data, aligning with the growing interest in data-driven safety management in the construction sector. Second, it provides large-scale, empirical evidence that challenges the traditional dogma of “human factor dominance” by systematically quantifying the critical role of environmental and managerial root causes. Third, it presents a transparent, data-driven protocol for transitioning from topic identification to causal analysis, moving from assertion to evidence. Future work should focus on integrating multi-dimensional data for comprehensive accident analysis.

BuildingsVol. 15(21)
Chang'an University (CN)
National Natural Science Foundation of China, Chang'an University, Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities
Openalex Percentile: Top 56%
Occupational Health and Safety Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.