Subgrain and Cavity Development during Creep of Al‐3.85%Mg

It is classically considered that the creep mechanisms for type M (e.g., pure Al) and type A alloys (e.g., Al–Mg alloys) are different. In previous studies, it is predicated that fractal dislocation structures build up during creep can unify the creep behavior of pure Al and Al–Mg alloys. So far, good agreement between model and experimental data for pure Al is obtained. In this work, an Al‐3.85%Mg material crept at different strain levels (6%, 12%, 24%, and 35%) is analyzed by means of electron channelling contrast imaging. The formation of subgrains is observed at very large deformations (35%). Further examinations at 35% deformation, using electron backscatter diffraction, indicate that the subgrains and cavities tend to localize at regions where high intergranular stress mismatch is expected to occur. Laboratory X‐ray computed tomography is used to analyze the evolution of cavities between 12% and 24% stages, indicating that the fractal dimension of the cavities smaller than 100 μm varies with creep strain, as a reflection of the evolution of dislocation distribution. It is explained how the present data feed the model of the creep behavior of Al‐3.85%Mg.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Advanced Engineering Materials
Published
2025-10-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/adem.202500263
Primary Topic
Microstructure and mechanical properties
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Subgrain and Cavity Development during Creep of Al‐3.85%Mg

Itziar Serrano‐Munoz, Ricardo Fernández, G. González-Doncel, Aleksander Kostka et al.
Advanced Engineering Materials
Microstructure and mechanical properties
article

Subgrain and Cavity Development during Creep of Al‐3.85%Mg

Itziar Serrano‐Munoz, Ricardo Fernández, G. González-Doncel, Aleksander Kostka, Martinus Putra Widjaja, Augusta Isaac, Giovanni Bruno
article en

Abstract

It is classically considered that the creep mechanisms for type M (e.g., pure Al) and type A alloys (e.g., Al–Mg alloys) are different. In previous studies, it is predicated that fractal dislocation structures build up during creep can unify the creep behavior of pure Al and Al–Mg alloys. So far, good agreement between model and experimental data for pure Al is obtained. In this work, an Al‐3.85%Mg material crept at different strain levels (6%, 12%, 24%, and 35%) is analyzed by means of electron channelling contrast imaging. The formation of subgrains is observed at very large deformations (35%). Further examinations at 35% deformation, using electron backscatter diffraction, indicate that the subgrains and cavities tend to localize at regions where high intergranular stress mismatch is expected to occur. Laboratory X‐ray computed tomography is used to analyze the evolution of cavities between 12% and 24% stages, indicating that the fractal dimension of the cavities smaller than 100 μm varies with creep strain, as a reflection of the evolution of dislocation distribution. It is explained how the present data feed the model of the creep behavior of Al‐3.85%Mg.

Advanced Engineering MaterialsVol. 27(23)
Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (BR), Federal Institute For Materials Research and Testing (DE), University of Potsdam (DE), Cenim - Centro Nacional de Investigaciones Metalurgicas (ES), Ruhr University Bochum (DE)
Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior
Openalex Percentile: Top 75%
Microstructure and mechanical properties
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.