Explaining CSR Disclosure Levels of U.S. Firms

ABSTRACT This paper uses panel data of U.S. firms to investigate the firm and political characteristics that are associated with voluntary environmental and social disclosures. Firm characteristics that have positive association with both environmental and social disclosures include corporate social responsibility board committee presence, number of analysts covering the firm, and the firm's environmental and social performances, respectively. Capital expenditures, insider ownership percentage, and institutional ownership percentage have a negative association with both types of disclosures. Individually, outside director percentage has a positive and Chairman‐CEO duality has a negative association with social disclosure. Firm financial characteristics and political environment largely have no association with environmental and social disclosures. Our use of panel data controlling for firm fixed effects and employing a rich set of explanatory variables serves also to check the robustness of the variables identified as significant in prior studies that used fewer observations with a limited set of explanatory variables. These results enhance our understanding of firm characteristics that are compatible or incompatible with both types of voluntary disclosures.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Business Finance &amp Accounting
Published
2025-10-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/jbfa.70018
Primary Topic
Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Explaining CSR Disclosure Levels of U.S. Firms

Terrence F. Martell, Mert Demir, Mehmet Ozbilgin
Journal of Business Finance &amp Accounting
Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting
article

Explaining CSR Disclosure Levels of U.S. Firms

Terrence F. Martell, Mert Demir, Mehmet Ozbilgin
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT This paper uses panel data of U.S. firms to investigate the firm and political characteristics that are associated with voluntary environmental and social disclosures. Firm characteristics that have positive association with both environmental and social disclosures include corporate social responsibility board committee presence, number of analysts covering the firm, and the firm's environmental and social performances, respectively. Capital expenditures, insider ownership percentage, and institutional ownership percentage have a negative association with both types of disclosures. Individually, outside director percentage has a positive and Chairman‐CEO duality has a negative association with social disclosure. Firm financial characteristics and political environment largely have no association with environmental and social disclosures. Our use of panel data controlling for firm fixed effects and employing a rich set of explanatory variables serves also to check the robustness of the variables identified as significant in prior studies that used fewer observations with a limited set of explanatory variables. These results enhance our understanding of firm characteristics that are compatible or incompatible with both types of voluntary disclosures.

Journal of Business Finance &amp AccountingVol. 53(1)
Baruch College (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 55%
Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.