Validation of the Nursing Competency Scale for Intensive Care Unit Nurses and Prediction of Nursing Competency Using the Clinical Ladder

Purpose : This study aims to examine the validity of the clinical grade-based nursing competency scale developed for intensive care unit (ICU) nurses and to provide foundational evidence for human resource management and development of ICU nurses. Methods : Data were collected from 180 ICU nurses across seven hospitals. A previously developed 309-item nursing competency scale, based on a clinical ladder system for ICU nurses, was revised through expert review and content validation to reflect current ICU practices, resulting in 128-item scale across 12 domains. Data were analyzed using t-tests, ANOVA, and Scheffé post-hoc tests. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was conducted to assess the predictive accuracy using a clinical ladder. Results : Nursing competencies differed significantly according to the clinical ladder. Proficient nurses scored significantly higher than nurses in other grades in clinical judgment and measures (F=9.44, p <.001), ward work processing ability (F=11.43, p < .001), resource management (F=5.77, p =.001), developing others (F=7.43, p <.001), and overall competence (F=6.62, p <.001). ROC analysis showed good predictive power for the proficient (AUC=0.71), whereas the novice nurses demonstrated sufficient predictive power (AUC=0.61). Conclusion : The findings suggest that this scale is valid for evaluating ICU nurses’ competency across the clinical ladder and may provide foundational data for workforce development and competency-based assessments.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Korean Critical Care Nursing
Published
2025-10-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.34250/jkccn.2025.18.3.78
Primary Topic
Healthcare Education and Workforce Issues
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Validation of the Nursing Competency Scale for Intensive Care Unit Nurses and Prediction of Nursing Competency Using the Clinical Ladder

Jaehee Jeon, Jin Hee Kim, Eun-Hee Choi
Journal of Korean Critical Care Nursing
Healthcare Education and Workforce Issues
article

Validation of the Nursing Competency Scale for Intensive Care Unit Nurses and Prediction of Nursing Competency Using the Clinical Ladder

Jaehee Jeon, Jin Hee Kim, Eun-Hee Choi
article en

Abstract

Purpose : This study aims to examine the validity of the clinical grade-based nursing competency scale developed for intensive care unit (ICU) nurses and to provide foundational evidence for human resource management and development of ICU nurses. Methods : Data were collected from 180 ICU nurses across seven hospitals. A previously developed 309-item nursing competency scale, based on a clinical ladder system for ICU nurses, was revised through expert review and content validation to reflect current ICU practices, resulting in 128-item scale across 12 domains. Data were analyzed using t-tests, ANOVA, and Scheffé post-hoc tests. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was conducted to assess the predictive accuracy using a clinical ladder. Results : Nursing competencies differed significantly according to the clinical ladder. Proficient nurses scored significantly higher than nurses in other grades in clinical judgment and measures (F=9.44, p <.001), ward work processing ability (F=11.43, p < .001), resource management (F=5.77, p =.001), developing others (F=7.43, p <.001), and overall competence (F=6.62, p <.001). ROC analysis showed good predictive power for the proficient (AUC=0.71), whereas the novice nurses demonstrated sufficient predictive power (AUC=0.61). Conclusion : The findings suggest that this scale is valid for evaluating ICU nurses’ competency across the clinical ladder and may provide foundational data for workforce development and competency-based assessments.

Journal of Korean Critical Care NursingVol. 18(3)
Openalex Percentile: Top 31%
Healthcare Education and Workforce Issues
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.