Prioritization of outcome measures in regional anesthesia research

This consensus-based, patient-centered framework defines the core priorities for future regional anesthesia and acute pain research. Future work should focus on developing and validating a regional anesthesia-specific quality-of-recovery instrument, refining multidimensional measures such as functional recovery, cognitive outcomes, and the Brief Pain Inventory, and standardizing the reporting of chronic pain and opioid-related outcomes. Adoption of these priorities will enhance methodological consistency, comparability, and patient relevance in future clinical trials.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Regional Anesthesia & Pain Medicine
Published
2025-10-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1136/rapm-2025-107087
Primary Topic
Anesthesia and Pain Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Prioritization of outcome measures in regional anesthesia research

Enas Kandil, Afak Nsiri, Εleni Μoka, Carlos A. Pino et al.
Regional Anesthesia & Pain Medicine
Anesthesia and Pain Management
article

Prioritization of outcome measures in regional anesthesia research

Enas Kandil, Afak Nsiri, Εleni Μoka, Carlos A. Pino, Reda Tolba, Samer Narouze, Éric Albrecht, Rajnish K. Gupta, Kariem El‐Boghdadly, Paul Stewart Myles, Kate Rivett, Clara Lobo, Sanjib Das Adhikary, Steve Coppens, Amany E. Ayad, Iyabo O. Muse, Peter Van de Putte, Andre Theron, Nabil Elkassabany, Vinita Singh, Kristin L. Schreiber, Morné Wolmarans, Jeffrey J. Pasternak, Sandra L. Kopp, Lynn R Kohan, James Simeon Bowness, Marie N. Hanna, Stavros G. Memtsoudis, Gillian Radcliffe, Rebecca L. Johnson, Kenneth D. Candido, Zuzana Princova
article en

Abstract

This consensus-based, patient-centered framework defines the core priorities for future regional anesthesia and acute pain research. Future work should focus on developing and validating a regional anesthesia-specific quality-of-recovery instrument, refining multidimensional measures such as functional recovery, cognitive outcomes, and the Brief Pain Inventory, and standardizing the reporting of chronic pain and opioid-related outcomes. Adoption of these priorities will enhance methodological consistency, comparability, and patient relevance in future clinical trials.

Regional Anesthesia & Pain Medicine
Unifor (NO), Hospital for Special Surgery (US), University College Hospital (GB), Naval Medical Center San Diego (US), Cleveland Clinic (US), Mayo Clinic (US), Johns Hopkins University (US), Cairo University (EG), Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences (US), Emory University (US), King's College London (GB), Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust (GB), Cornell University (US), Aristotle University of Thessaloniki (GR), University of the Free State (ZA), University Hospitals of Cleveland (US), Norfolk and Norwich University Hospital (GB), Advocate Good Samaritan Hospital (US), Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois (CH), Pain Management Institute (US), Lebanon VA Medical Center (US), Southwestern Medical Center (US), Imelda Hospital (BE), Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Ibn Rochd (MA), University College London (GB), University of Virginia (US), Monash University (AU), Case Western Reserve University (US), The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center (US), Vanderbilt University Medical Center (US), Stanford University (US), University of Hassan II Casablanca (MA), KU Leuven (BE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 51%
Anesthesia and Pain Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.