“You Don’t Have to Tell Them It’s a Lie”: Teaching Social Studies within a Backsliding Democracy

In this essay, the authors posit that democratic backsliding, rather than partisanship, is the prevailing political situation in which civics and social studies teachers are working. The authors then present evidence from focus groups composed of practicing social studies teachers from across the United States to illustrate how the reliance on evidence and argumentation is the primary mode of navigating contemporary political issues. However, while these strategies are built on decades of research in civic education, the authors illustrate a conceptual dilemma: Inquiry strategies may not be able to accommodate the realities of democratic backsliding and its attendant misinformation. The authors propose that reframing inquiries in terms of pro- or anti-democratic stances rather than more traditional liberal-versus-conservative framings could be a potential way forward.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Democracy & Education
Published
2025-10-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.65214/2164-7992.1682
Primary Topic
Educator Training and Historical Pedagogy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

“You Don’t Have to Tell Them It’s a Lie”: Teaching Social Studies within a Backsliding Democracy

Christopher H. Clark, H. James Garrett, Mardi Schmeichel
Democracy & Education
Educator Training and Historical Pedagogy
article

“You Don’t Have to Tell Them It’s a Lie”: Teaching Social Studies within a Backsliding Democracy

Christopher H. Clark, H. James Garrett, Mardi Schmeichel
article en

Abstract

In this essay, the authors posit that democratic backsliding, rather than partisanship, is the prevailing political situation in which civics and social studies teachers are working. The authors then present evidence from focus groups composed of practicing social studies teachers from across the United States to illustrate how the reliance on evidence and argumentation is the primary mode of navigating contemporary political issues. However, while these strategies are built on decades of research in civic education, the authors illustrate a conceptual dilemma: Inquiry strategies may not be able to accommodate the realities of democratic backsliding and its attendant misinformation. The authors propose that reframing inquiries in terms of pro- or anti-democratic stances rather than more traditional liberal-versus-conservative framings could be a potential way forward.

Democracy & EducationVol. 33(2)
University of Nebraska–Lincoln (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 59%
Educator Training and Historical Pedagogy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.