Understanding extreme-wave hazards on high-energy coasts requires a standardised approach to field data collection: analysis and recommendations

Abstract. Coastal boulder deposits provide vital information on extreme wave events. They are crucial for understanding storm and tsunami impacts on rocky coasts, and for understanding long-term hazard histories. But study of these deposits is still a young field, and growth in investigation has been rapid, without much contact between research groups. Therefore, inconsistencies in field data collection among different studies hinder cross-site comparisons and limit the applicability of findings across disciplines. This paper analyses field methodologies for coastal boulder deposit measurement based using an integrated database (ISROC-DB), and demonstrates inconsistencies in current approaches. We use the analysis as a basis for outlining protocols to improve data comparability and utility for geoscientists, engineers, and coastal planners. Using standardised and comprehensive data reporting with due attention to precision and reproducibility – including site characteristics, boulder dimensions, complete positional data, tide characteristics, and geodetic and local topographic datum information – will help ensure complete data retrieval in the field. Applying these approaches will further ensure that data collected at different times and/or locations, and by different groups, is useful not just for the study being undertaken, but for other researchers to analyse and reuse. We hope to foster development of the large, internally consistent datasets that are the basis for fruitful meta-analysis. This is particularly important given increasing focus on long-term monitoring of coastal change. By recommending a common set of measurements, adaptable to available equipment and personnel, this work aims to support accurate and thorough coastal boulder deposit documentation, enabling broader applicability and future-proofed datasets. Field protocols described and recommended here also apply as best practices for coastal geomorphology field work in general.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Natural hazards and earth system sciences
Published
2025-10-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-25-4203-2025
Primary Topic
earthquake and tectonic studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Understanding extreme-wave hazards on high-energy coasts requires a standardised approach to field data collection: analysis and recommendations

M. C. Bourke, Dimitra Salmanidou, Wayne Stephenson, Sarah J. Boulton et al.
Natural hazards and earth system sciences
earthquake and tectonic studies
article

Understanding extreme-wave hazards on high-energy coasts requires a standardised approach to field data collection: analysis and recommendations

M. C. Bourke, Dimitra Salmanidou, Wayne Stephenson, Sarah J. Boulton, Masashi Watanabe, Nadia Mhammdi, Andrew Kennedy, A. Y. Annie Lau, Storm Roberts, Raphaël Paris, Niamh Cullen, Serge Suanez, Max Engel, Rónadh Cox, Michaela Spiske, Adam D. Switzer, Maria Alexandra Oliveira
article en

Abstract

Abstract. Coastal boulder deposits provide vital information on extreme wave events. They are crucial for understanding storm and tsunami impacts on rocky coasts, and for understanding long-term hazard histories. But study of these deposits is still a young field, and growth in investigation has been rapid, without much contact between research groups. Therefore, inconsistencies in field data collection among different studies hinder cross-site comparisons and limit the applicability of findings across disciplines. This paper analyses field methodologies for coastal boulder deposit measurement based using an integrated database (ISROC-DB), and demonstrates inconsistencies in current approaches. We use the analysis as a basis for outlining protocols to improve data comparability and utility for geoscientists, engineers, and coastal planners. Using standardised and comprehensive data reporting with due attention to precision and reproducibility – including site characteristics, boulder dimensions, complete positional data, tide characteristics, and geodetic and local topographic datum information – will help ensure complete data retrieval in the field. Applying these approaches will further ensure that data collected at different times and/or locations, and by different groups, is useful not just for the study being undertaken, but for other researchers to analyse and reuse. We hope to foster development of the large, internally consistent datasets that are the basis for fruitful meta-analysis. This is particularly important given increasing focus on long-term monitoring of coastal change. By recommending a common set of measurements, adaptable to available equipment and personnel, this work aims to support accurate and thorough coastal boulder deposit documentation, enabling broader applicability and future-proofed datasets. Field protocols described and recommended here also apply as best practices for coastal geomorphology field work in general.

Natural hazards and earth system sciencesVol. 25(10)
University of Notre Dame (US), Mohammed V University (MA), Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR), University of Bonn (DE), Université de Bretagne Occidentale (FR), The University of Queensland (AU), Nanyang Technological University (SG), National Oceanography Centre (GB), Université Clermont Auvergne (FR), Trinity College Dublin (IE), Heidelberg University (DE), Williams College (US), Sustainability Institute (ZA), Earth Observatory of Singapore (SG), Laboratoire Magmas et Volcans (FR), Institut Universitaire Européen de la Mer (FR), Institut de Recherche pour le Développement (FR), Dublin City University (IE), University of Southampton (GB), Littoral, Environnement, Télédétection, Géomatique (FR), University College London (GB), University of Otago (NZ), University of Plymouth (GB)
National Science Foundation, Directorate for Geosciences, Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia
Openalex Percentile: Top 67%
earthquake and tectonic studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.