The Wind Off Test: A Novel Clinical Test for TFCC Tears

Abstract Distal radioulnar joint (DRUJ) instability is a common yet underdiagnosed cause of ulnar-sided wrist pain, often associated with triangular fibrocartilage complex (TFCC) injuries. Clinical assessment of DRUJ instability is challenging due to the limited reliability of existing tests. This study introduces the wind off test (WOT) as a novel clinical test for detecting TFCC tears and evaluates its diagnostic accuracy compared to arthroscopic findings. A retrospective audit was conducted on patients who underwent diagnostic wrist arthroscopy over 12 months. The WOT result (positive or negative) was compared with arthroscopically confirmed TFCC tears. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value, and diagnostic accuracy were calculated. Patients without a recorded WOT result preoperatively were excluded. 79 patients met the inclusion criteria for this study. Of these, 76 had a TFCC tear confirmed at arthroscopy. The WOT demonstrated a sensitivity of 92.1%, a specificity of 0.0%, a PPV of 95.9%, and a diagnostic accuracy of 88.6%. Notably, all patients without a TFCC tear had a positive WOT, resulting in no true negatives. The WOT is a highly sensitive test for detecting TFCC tears but lacks specificity, leading to false positives. While the test may serve as a useful screening tool, it should be interpreted alongside other clinical findings, imaging studies, and arthroscopy when necessary. Further prospective studies are needed to assess interobserver reliability and compare the WOT with existing clinical tests for TFCC tears.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Wrist Surgery
Published
2025-10-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2716-3822
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Orthopedic Surgery and Rehabilitation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.01
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Wind Off Test: A Novel Clinical Test for TFCC Tears

Jeff Ecker, Zoe Jones
1 citations
Journal of Wrist Surgery
Orthopedic Surgery and Rehabilitation
2.01
article

The Wind Off Test: A Novel Clinical Test for TFCC Tears

Jeff Ecker, Zoe Jones
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract Distal radioulnar joint (DRUJ) instability is a common yet underdiagnosed cause of ulnar-sided wrist pain, often associated with triangular fibrocartilage complex (TFCC) injuries. Clinical assessment of DRUJ instability is challenging due to the limited reliability of existing tests. This study introduces the wind off test (WOT) as a novel clinical test for detecting TFCC tears and evaluates its diagnostic accuracy compared to arthroscopic findings. A retrospective audit was conducted on patients who underwent diagnostic wrist arthroscopy over 12 months. The WOT result (positive or negative) was compared with arthroscopically confirmed TFCC tears. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value, and diagnostic accuracy were calculated. Patients without a recorded WOT result preoperatively were excluded. 79 patients met the inclusion criteria for this study. Of these, 76 had a TFCC tear confirmed at arthroscopy. The WOT demonstrated a sensitivity of 92.1%, a specificity of 0.0%, a PPV of 95.9%, and a diagnostic accuracy of 88.6%. Notably, all patients without a TFCC tear had a positive WOT, resulting in no true negatives. The WOT is a highly sensitive test for detecting TFCC tears but lacks specificity, leading to false positives. While the test may serve as a useful screening tool, it should be interpreted alongside other clinical findings, imaging studies, and arthroscopy when necessary. Further prospective studies are needed to assess interobserver reliability and compare the WOT with existing clinical tests for TFCC tears.

Journal of Wrist Surgery
The University of Western Australia (AU), Curtin University (AU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Orthopedic Surgery and Rehabilitation
2.01
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.