Understanding barriers to clinical trial participation among U.S. women: a national survey study

Abstract Despite the persistent underrepresentation of women—particularly those from racially and ethnically minoritized groups—in clinical research, little is known about their perspectives on participation. This study examined healthcare experiences, access, and attitudes toward clinical trials among U.S. women and assessed how race, socioeconomic status, and healthcare access intersect to shape willingness to participate (WTP). We conducted a national cross-sectional online survey (January–March 2023) of 5,301 women aged 18–70 years. The 81-item questionnaire assessed demographics, health status, healthcare access, and clinical trial experiences. Among 4,987 respondents reporting race (77% White, 14% Black, 7% Asian, 2% Other), nearly 80% expressed interest in participating in clinical trials, yet only 11% had been invited and 7% had enrolled. In adjusted models, WTP was lower among Black (β = −0.06; P = .04) and Asian (β = −0.09; P = .01) women than among White women, whereas higher educational attainment and multimorbidity predicted greater WTP. Altruism, clear study explanations, and financial compensation were key motivators, while time burden and concerns about side effects were major barriers, with the salience of these factors varying by race. Most respondents (88%) endorsed the importance of women’s inclusion and sex-specific reporting, though neutrality on these issues was more frequent among racially minoritized women. Despite high interest, structural and informational barriers continue to constrain women’s engagement in clinical research, underscoring the need for trust-building, burden-reducing, and culturally responsive strategies to promote equitable participation and improve representation across racial groups.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Scientific Reports
Published
2026-11-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-78407-3
Primary Topic
Ethics in Clinical Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
NOV
article

Understanding barriers to clinical trial participation among U.S. women: a national survey study

Gwen Petro, Therese A. Rajasekera, Julia C. Wilson, Primavera A. Spagnolo et al.
2 links
Scientific Reports
Ethics in Clinical Research
article

Understanding barriers to clinical trial participation among U.S. women: a national survey study

Gwen Petro, Therese A. Rajasekera, Julia C. Wilson, Primavera A. Spagnolo, Ancella Roy, Doruntina Fida, Ruth Lederman, Aleta Wiley
article en

Abstract

Abstract Despite the persistent underrepresentation of women—particularly those from racially and ethnically minoritized groups—in clinical research, little is known about their perspectives on participation. This study examined healthcare experiences, access, and attitudes toward clinical trials among U.S. women and assessed how race, socioeconomic status, and healthcare access intersect to shape willingness to participate (WTP). We conducted a national cross-sectional online survey (January–March 2023) of 5,301 women aged 18–70 years. The 81-item questionnaire assessed demographics, health status, healthcare access, and clinical trial experiences. Among 4,987 respondents reporting race (77% White, 14% Black, 7% Asian, 2% Other), nearly 80% expressed interest in participating in clinical trials, yet only 11% had been invited and 7% had enrolled. In adjusted models, WTP was lower among Black (β = −0.06; P = .04) and Asian (β = −0.09; P = .01) women than among White women, whereas higher educational attainment and multimorbidity predicted greater WTP. Altruism, clear study explanations, and financial compensation were key motivators, while time burden and concerns about side effects were major barriers, with the salience of these factors varying by race. Most respondents (88%) endorsed the importance of women’s inclusion and sex-specific reporting, though neutrality on these issues was more frequent among racially minoritized women. Despite high interest, structural and informational barriers continue to constrain women’s engagement in clinical research, underscoring the need for trust-building, burden-reducing, and culturally responsive strategies to promote equitable participation and improve representation across racial groups.

Scientific Reports
Brigham and Women's Hospital (US), Harvard University (US), University of Massachusetts Chan Medical School (US), Dana-Farber Cancer Institute (US), Columbia University (US)
Brigham and Women's Hospital
Reduced inequalities, Good health and well-being, Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 100%
Ethics in Clinical Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon