Look at ME, what do WE see? Drivers of online ESG sentiment

Purpose Institutional pressures can drive firms to adopt environmental, social and governance (ESG) practices, which makes the evaluation of ESG performance relevant. Additionally, extant literature debates the difference between the “perception” and the “reality” of such assessments. Our study aims to explore the firm-related drivers of online perceptions of corporate ESG behavior. Design/methodology/approach We develop a set of hypotheses regarding firm-related drivers of online ESG sentiment. Our key argument is that these drivers reflect online perceptions of firms’ commitment to ESG, which are potentially shaped by stakeholder pressure online. We test our hypotheses on a panel of 113 firms across 16 countries using multivariate statistical mixed modeling. Findings In line with our hypotheses, firm size and profitability negatively affect online ESG sentiment. In contrast, board size positively affects online ESG sentiment, with a value above which the relationship ceases to be significant. We find no significant relationship with board gender diversity. Practical implications Online ESG sentiment should be considered a potential input to shape corporate purposes and ESG practices. Furthermore, firms should be aware that external actors’ discourse and interactions online can affect their image and reputation. Originality/value This study investigates online ESG sentiment and its potential drivers, thereby contributing to the ESG literature. Investigating online ESG sentiment by leveraging social movement theory represents a promising avenue for gaining insights into its causal constituents.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Management Decision
Published
2025-10-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1108/md-03-2024-0676
Primary Topic
Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Look at ME, what do WE see? Drivers of online ESG sentiment

Anna Minà, Francesca Costanza, Marco Torri, Sergio Paternostro
Management Decision
Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting
article

Look at ME, what do WE see? Drivers of online ESG sentiment

Anna Minà, Francesca Costanza, Marco Torri, Sergio Paternostro
article en

Abstract

Purpose Institutional pressures can drive firms to adopt environmental, social and governance (ESG) practices, which makes the evaluation of ESG performance relevant. Additionally, extant literature debates the difference between the “perception” and the “reality” of such assessments. Our study aims to explore the firm-related drivers of online perceptions of corporate ESG behavior. Design/methodology/approach We develop a set of hypotheses regarding firm-related drivers of online ESG sentiment. Our key argument is that these drivers reflect online perceptions of firms’ commitment to ESG, which are potentially shaped by stakeholder pressure online. We test our hypotheses on a panel of 113 firms across 16 countries using multivariate statistical mixed modeling. Findings In line with our hypotheses, firm size and profitability negatively affect online ESG sentiment. In contrast, board size positively affects online ESG sentiment, with a value above which the relationship ceases to be significant. We find no significant relationship with board gender diversity. Practical implications Online ESG sentiment should be considered a potential input to shape corporate purposes and ESG practices. Furthermore, firms should be aware that external actors’ discourse and interactions online can affect their image and reputation. Originality/value This study investigates online ESG sentiment and its potential drivers, thereby contributing to the ESG literature. Investigating online ESG sentiment by leveraging social movement theory represents a promising avenue for gaining insights into its causal constituents.

Management Decision
Libera Università Maria SS. Assunta (IT), National Research Council (RO), Istituto di Studi sul Mediterraneo (CNR - ISMed) (IT)
Openalex Percentile: Top 55%
Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Look at ME, what do WE see? Drivers of online ESG sentiment — Anna Minà, Francesca Costanza, et al. · Management Decision (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS