Machine learning methods to identify markers and predict antimicrobial resistance in <i>Escherichia coli</i>

Antimicrobial resistant strains of pathogenic <i>Escherichia coli</i> are a burden on the healthcare system, causing longer hospital stays and increased treatment costs compared to nonresistant strains. With whole genome sequencing almost ubiquitous in the analyses of outbreak and surveillance samples<i>,</i> in silico methods for feature identification can be faster and cheaper than traditional wet-lab methods. In this study, machine learning (ML) classification methods were used to predict antimicrobial resistance (AMR) and identify novel genomic markers of resistance. A total of 4300 <i>E. coli</i> whole genome sequences with laboratory-derived susceptible, intermediate, or resistant (SIR) data for 34 antimicrobials were collected. Three models-gradient boosted decision trees, support vector machines (SVMs), and artificial neural networks (ANNs)-were trained using genome subsequences (<i>k</i>-mers) of length 11 to classify unknown isolates as SIR for each antimicrobial. The models achieved high average accuracies (93.6%, 92.7%, and 92.8%, respectively) for our dataset, outperforming database methods including AMRFinderPlus (63.9%) and ResFinder (75.7%). Tested on two smaller independent datasets, the models' average accuracies were 81.6% (XGB), 79.9% (SVM), and 81.2% (ANN), while ResFinder's average accuracy was 94.7%. An advantage of ML models over database methods is that they can identify novel markers of resistance, which is a key advantage for surveillance and research. As more genomic and AMR data become publicly available, these models are expected to further improve in performance and utility.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Canadian Journal of Microbiology
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1139/cjm-2024-0208
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Machine Learning in Bioinformatics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.81
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Machine learning methods to identify markers and predict antimicrobial resistance in Escherichia coli

Rahat Zaheer, Athanasios Zovoilis, Tim Angus McAllister, Rylan Steinkey et al.
1 citations
Canadian Journal of Microbiology
Machine Learning in Bioinformatics
0.81
article

Machine learning methods to identify markers and predict antimicrobial resistance in Escherichia coli

Rahat Zaheer, Athanasios Zovoilis, Tim Angus McAllister, Rylan Steinkey, Chad Laing, Janice Moat
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Antimicrobial resistant strains of pathogenic <i>Escherichia coli</i> are a burden on the healthcare system, causing longer hospital stays and increased treatment costs compared to nonresistant strains. With whole genome sequencing almost ubiquitous in the analyses of outbreak and surveillance samples<i>,</i> in silico methods for feature identification can be faster and cheaper than traditional wet-lab methods. In this study, machine learning (ML) classification methods were used to predict antimicrobial resistance (AMR) and identify novel genomic markers of resistance. A total of 4300 <i>E. coli</i> whole genome sequences with laboratory-derived susceptible, intermediate, or resistant (SIR) data for 34 antimicrobials were collected. Three models-gradient boosted decision trees, support vector machines (SVMs), and artificial neural networks (ANNs)-were trained using genome subsequences (<i>k</i>-mers) of length 11 to classify unknown isolates as SIR for each antimicrobial. The models achieved high average accuracies (93.6%, 92.7%, and 92.8%, respectively) for our dataset, outperforming database methods including AMRFinderPlus (63.9%) and ResFinder (75.7%). Tested on two smaller independent datasets, the models' average accuracies were 81.6% (XGB), 79.9% (SVM), and 81.2% (ANN), while ResFinder's average accuracy was 94.7%. An advantage of ML models over database methods is that they can identify novel markers of resistance, which is a key advantage for surveillance and research. As more genomic and AMR data become publicly available, these models are expected to further improve in performance and utility.

Canadian Journal of MicrobiologyVol. 71
University of Lethbridge (CA), Canadian Food Inspection Agency (CA), Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada (CA), Public Health Agency of Canada (CA), Genome Canada (CA), Institut des Sciences Cognitives Marc Jeannerod (FR), Lethbridge Research and Development Centre, University of Manitoba (CA), Lethbridge College (CA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 22%
Machine Learning in Bioinformatics
0.81
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.