The richest clusters in the Coma and Leo superclusters: Properties and evolution

Context. Superclusters of galaxies represent dynamically active environments in which galaxies and their systems form and evolve. Aims. We study the substructure, connectivity, and galaxy content of galaxy clusters A1656 and A1367 in the Coma supercluster and of A1185 in the Leo supercluster with the aim of understanding the evolution of clusters from turnaround to virialisation, and the evolution of whole superclusters. Methods. We used data from the Sloan Digital Sky Survey DR10 MAIN galaxy sample and from DESI cluster catalogues. The projected phase space diagram and the distribution of mass were used to identify regions of various infall stages (early and late infall, and regions of ongoing infall, i.e. regions of influence), their characteristic radii, embedded mass, and density contrasts in order to study the evolution of clusters with the spherical collapse model. We determined the substructure of clusters using normal mixture modelling and their connectivity by counting filaments in the cluster’s regions of influence. We analysed galaxy content in clusters and in their environment and derived scaling relations between cluster masses. Results. All three clusters have a substructure with two to five components and up to six filaments connected to them. The radii of regions of influence are R inf ≈ 4 h −1 Mpc, and the density contrast at their borders is Δ ρ inf ≈ 50 − 60. The scaling relations between the masses of clusters have a very small scatter. The galaxy content of the clusters and of their regions of influence vary from cluster to cluster. In high-density regions (superclusters), the percentage of quiescent galaxies is higher than in low-density regions between superclusters, where approximately one-fourth of the galaxies are still quiescent. Conclusions. The collapse of the regions of influence of clusters started at redshifts z ≈ 0.4 − 0.5. Clusters will be virialised approximately in ≈3.3 Gyrs. Clusters in superclusters will not merge, and their present-day turnaround regions will be virialised in ≈10 Gyrs. The large variety of properties of clusters suggests that they have followed different paths during evolution.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Astronomy and Astrophysics
Published
2025-10-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/202556023
Primary Topic
Galaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The richest clusters in the Coma and Leo superclusters: Properties and evolution

Elmo Tempel, Rain Kipper, J. Einasto, P. Heinämäki et al.
Astronomy and Astrophysics
Galaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena
article

The richest clusters in the Coma and Leo superclusters: Properties and evolution

Elmo Tempel, Rain Kipper, J. Einasto, P. Heinämäki, Jennifer West, Boris Deshev, M. Einasto, P. Tenjes, Lauri Juhan Liivamägi
article en

Abstract

Context. Superclusters of galaxies represent dynamically active environments in which galaxies and their systems form and evolve. Aims. We study the substructure, connectivity, and galaxy content of galaxy clusters A1656 and A1367 in the Coma supercluster and of A1185 in the Leo supercluster with the aim of understanding the evolution of clusters from turnaround to virialisation, and the evolution of whole superclusters. Methods. We used data from the Sloan Digital Sky Survey DR10 MAIN galaxy sample and from DESI cluster catalogues. The projected phase space diagram and the distribution of mass were used to identify regions of various infall stages (early and late infall, and regions of ongoing infall, i.e. regions of influence), their characteristic radii, embedded mass, and density contrasts in order to study the evolution of clusters with the spherical collapse model. We determined the substructure of clusters using normal mixture modelling and their connectivity by counting filaments in the cluster’s regions of influence. We analysed galaxy content in clusters and in their environment and derived scaling relations between cluster masses. Results. All three clusters have a substructure with two to five components and up to six filaments connected to them. The radii of regions of influence are R inf ≈ 4 h −1 Mpc, and the density contrast at their borders is Δ ρ inf ≈ 50 − 60. The scaling relations between the masses of clusters have a very small scatter. The galaxy content of the clusters and of their regions of influence vary from cluster to cluster. In high-density regions (superclusters), the percentage of quiescent galaxies is higher than in low-density regions between superclusters, where approximately one-fourth of the galaxies are still quiescent. Conclusions. The collapse of the regions of influence of clusters started at redshifts z ≈ 0.4 − 0.5. Clusters will be virialised approximately in ≈3.3 Gyrs. Clusters in superclusters will not merge, and their present-day turnaround regions will be virialised in ≈10 Gyrs. The large variety of properties of clusters suggests that they have followed different paths during evolution.

Astronomy and AstrophysicsVol. 704
University of Turku (FI), Estonian Academy of Sciences (EE), Lowell Observatory (US), Tartu Observatory (EE), International Center for Relativistic Astrophysics (IT), University of Tartu (EE)
European Commission, Eesti Teadusagentuur, HORIZON EUROPE Framework Programme
Openalex Percentile: Top 78%
Galaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.