Beyond diagnostic-diagrams: A critical exploration of the classification of ionization processes

Context. Diagnostic diagrams based on optical emission lines, especially classical BPT diagrams, have long been used to distinguish the dominant ionisation mechanisms in galaxies. However, these methods suffer from degeneracies and limitations, particularly when applied to complex systems such as galaxies, where multiple ionisation sources coexist. Aims. We aim to critically assess the effectiveness of commonly used diagnostic diagrams in identifying star-forming galaxies, retired galaxies (RGs), and active galactic nuclei (AGNs). We also explore alternative diagnostics and propose a revised classification scheme to reduce misclassifications and better reflect the physical mechanisms ionizing gas in galaxies. Methods. Using a comprehensive sample of nearby galaxies from the NASA-Sloan Atlas (NSA) cross-matched with Sloan Digital Sky Survey (SDSS) spectroscopic data, we defined archetypal subsamples of late-type and star-forming galaxies, early-type and retired galaxies, and multiwavelength-selected AGNs. We evaluated their distribution across classical and more recent diagnostic diagrams, including the WHaN, WHaD, and a newly proposed WHaO diagram, which combine H α equivalent width with additional indicators (N II /H α , σ H α and O III /O II , respectively). We carried out a quantitative comparison of the resulting classification across multiple schemes. Results. Classical BPT diagrams systematically overestimate the number of star-forming galaxies (∼10%) and misclassify a significant fraction of AGNs (up to 45%) and RGs (up to 100%). Diagrams incorporating the equivalent width of H α , such as WHaN, WHaD, or WHaO, yield more reliable separations (with ∼20% of AGNs and ∼15% of RGs erroneously classified). A new classification scheme based on EW(H α ) thresholds and concordant WHaD/WHaO results achieves an improved level of purity for all classes (with ∼8–25% sources erroneously classified) and a better alignment with known physical properties. Conclusions. The widely used BPT-based classifications fail to accurately distinguish between ionisation mechanisms, especially in galaxies hosting low-luminosity AGNs or retired stellar populations. Updated schemes incorporating EW(H α ) and complementary diagnostics, despite their respective limitations, provide a more accurate view of galaxy ionisation and should be adopted in future studies of galaxy populations and evolution.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Astronomy and Astrophysics
Published
2025-10-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/202556809
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Galaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.31
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Beyond diagnostic-diagrams: A critical exploration of the classification of ionization processes

J. Sánchez Alméida, S. F. Sánchez, C. Muñoz–Tuñón, Eric Pauli Perez et al.
2 citations
Astronomy and Astrophysics
Galaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena
2.31
article

Beyond diagnostic-diagrams: A critical exploration of the classification of ionization processes

J. Sánchez Alméida, S. F. Sánchez, C. Muñoz–Tuñón, Eric Pauli Perez, O. González-Mart́
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Context. Diagnostic diagrams based on optical emission lines, especially classical BPT diagrams, have long been used to distinguish the dominant ionisation mechanisms in galaxies. However, these methods suffer from degeneracies and limitations, particularly when applied to complex systems such as galaxies, where multiple ionisation sources coexist. Aims. We aim to critically assess the effectiveness of commonly used diagnostic diagrams in identifying star-forming galaxies, retired galaxies (RGs), and active galactic nuclei (AGNs). We also explore alternative diagnostics and propose a revised classification scheme to reduce misclassifications and better reflect the physical mechanisms ionizing gas in galaxies. Methods. Using a comprehensive sample of nearby galaxies from the NASA-Sloan Atlas (NSA) cross-matched with Sloan Digital Sky Survey (SDSS) spectroscopic data, we defined archetypal subsamples of late-type and star-forming galaxies, early-type and retired galaxies, and multiwavelength-selected AGNs. We evaluated their distribution across classical and more recent diagnostic diagrams, including the WHaN, WHaD, and a newly proposed WHaO diagram, which combine H α equivalent width with additional indicators (N II /H α , σ H α and O III /O II , respectively). We carried out a quantitative comparison of the resulting classification across multiple schemes. Results. Classical BPT diagrams systematically overestimate the number of star-forming galaxies (∼10%) and misclassify a significant fraction of AGNs (up to 45%) and RGs (up to 100%). Diagrams incorporating the equivalent width of H α , such as WHaN, WHaD, or WHaO, yield more reliable separations (with ∼20% of AGNs and ∼15% of RGs erroneously classified). A new classification scheme based on EW(H α ) thresholds and concordant WHaD/WHaO results achieves an improved level of purity for all classes (with ∼8–25% sources erroneously classified) and a better alignment with known physical properties. Conclusions. The widely used BPT-based classifications fail to accurately distinguish between ionisation mechanisms, especially in galaxies hosting low-luminosity AGNs or retired stellar populations. Updated schemes incorporating EW(H α ) and complementary diagnostics, despite their respective limitations, provide a more accurate view of galaxy ionisation and should be adopted in future studies of galaxy populations and evolution.

Astronomy and AstrophysicsVol. 704
Instituto de Astrofísica de Canarias (ES), Instituto Argentino de Radioastronomía (AR), Instituto de Astrofísica de Andalucía (ES), Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México (MX)
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Galaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena
2.31
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.