Leadership as Related to Moral Injury in a Military Context: A Systematic Scoping Literature Review

The dominating emphasis of psychological research into moral injury has focused on clinical assessment, diagnosis, and treatment. This article focuses on the particular case of the role of the leader/leadership in moral injury in a military context. To address this objective, a systematic scoping literature review was conducted with the aim of investigating the scope of existing research to identify gaps and encourage future research and interventions. Thematic analysis was used to structure the data in an explorative inductive manner and an attempt was made to integrate the themes identified to gain a more holistic understanding of the subject matter. The results show that a significant portion of the literature views leadership failure or leader betrayal as a potentially morally injurious event (PMIE), a primary cause (predictor) of moral injury. However, a significant number also view leadership as a key factor in the prevention and mitigation of moral injury. Consequently, the lack of empirical evidence focusing on the role of leadership in moral injury must be regarded as problematic and should be given greater emphasis to advance understanding and guide the development of effective, evidence-based interventions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Review of General Psychology
Published
2025-10-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/10892680251388427
Primary Topic
Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Leadership as Related to Moral Injury in a Military Context: A Systematic Scoping Literature Review

Sofia Nilsson
Review of General Psychology
Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research
article

Leadership as Related to Moral Injury in a Military Context: A Systematic Scoping Literature Review

Sofia Nilsson
article en

Abstract

The dominating emphasis of psychological research into moral injury has focused on clinical assessment, diagnosis, and treatment. This article focuses on the particular case of the role of the leader/leadership in moral injury in a military context. To address this objective, a systematic scoping literature review was conducted with the aim of investigating the scope of existing research to identify gaps and encourage future research and interventions. Thematic analysis was used to structure the data in an explorative inductive manner and an attempt was made to integrate the themes identified to gain a more holistic understanding of the subject matter. The results show that a significant portion of the literature views leadership failure or leader betrayal as a potentially morally injurious event (PMIE), a primary cause (predictor) of moral injury. However, a significant number also view leadership as a key factor in the prevention and mitigation of moral injury. Consequently, the lack of empirical evidence focusing on the role of leadership in moral injury must be regarded as problematic and should be given greater emphasis to advance understanding and guide the development of effective, evidence-based interventions.

Review of General Psychology
Swedish Defence University (SE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 57%
Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.