Micro-offline gains do not reflect offline learning during early motor skill acquisition in humans

While practicing a new motor skill, resting for a few seconds can improve performance immediately after the rest. This improvement, referred to as "micro-offline gains" (MOGs), has been interpreted as rapid offline learning and is thought to be supported by neural replay of the trained movement sequence during rest. Here, we provide evidence that MOGs reflect only transient performance benefits, partially mediated by motor planning, and not offline learning. In five experiments, participants trained to produce a sequence of finger movements as many times as possible. When participants trained during 10-s practice periods, interleaved with 10-s rest periods, they produced more correct keypresses during training than participants who trained continuously without taking breaks. However, this benefit vanished within seconds after training, when both groups performed under comparable conditions, revealing similar levels of skill acquisition. This challenges the idea that MOGs reflect offline learning, which, if present, should result in sustained performance benefits, compared to training without breaks. Furthermore, we observed persistent MOGs even when participants produced random, nonrepeating sequences, indicating that MOGs do not relate to the offline consolidation of a sequence-specific memory. Rather, sequence-specific learning was only evident online, during practice. Finally, MOGs were diminished when participants could not preplan the first few movements of an upcoming practice period. Our results suggest that MOG are simply an effect of slowing during practice, combined with the possibility of preplanning the initial movements after rest, and therefore do not serve as a reliable metric for offline learning or skill-related consolidation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
2025-10-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2509233122
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Motor Control and Adaptation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.86

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Micro-offline gains do not reflect offline learning during early motor skill acquisition in humans

Jörn Diedrichsen, Max‐Philipp Stenner, Anwesha Das, Elena Azañón et al.
2 citations
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Motor Control and Adaptation
2.86
article

Micro-offline gains do not reflect offline learning during early motor skill acquisition in humans

Jörn Diedrichsen, Max‐Philipp Stenner, Anwesha Das, Elena Azañón, Alexandros Karagiorgis
article en
2 citations

Abstract

While practicing a new motor skill, resting for a few seconds can improve performance immediately after the rest. This improvement, referred to as "micro-offline gains" (MOGs), has been interpreted as rapid offline learning and is thought to be supported by neural replay of the trained movement sequence during rest. Here, we provide evidence that MOGs reflect only transient performance benefits, partially mediated by motor planning, and not offline learning. In five experiments, participants trained to produce a sequence of finger movements as many times as possible. When participants trained during 10-s practice periods, interleaved with 10-s rest periods, they produced more correct keypresses during training than participants who trained continuously without taking breaks. However, this benefit vanished within seconds after training, when both groups performed under comparable conditions, revealing similar levels of skill acquisition. This challenges the idea that MOGs reflect offline learning, which, if present, should result in sustained performance benefits, compared to training without breaks. Furthermore, we observed persistent MOGs even when participants produced random, nonrepeating sequences, indicating that MOGs do not relate to the offline consolidation of a sequence-specific memory. Rather, sequence-specific learning was only evident online, during practice. Finally, MOGs were diminished when participants could not preplan the first few movements of an upcoming practice period. Our results suggest that MOG are simply an effect of slowing during practice, combined with the possibility of preplanning the initial movements after rest, and therefore do not serve as a reliable metric for offline learning or skill-related consolidation.

Proceedings of the National Academy of SciencesVol. 122(44)
Western University (CA), University of Mines and Technology (GH), Klinikum Magdeburg (DE), Center for Behavioral Brain Sciences (DE), IntellADAPT (United States) (US), Statistical Service (CY), Otto-von-Guericke-Universität Magdeburg (DE), Leibniz Institute for Neurobiology (DE)
Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft, Volkswagen Foundation, Canada First Research Excellence Fund
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Motor Control and Adaptation
2.86
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.