Effects of Intercropping Long- and Short-Season Varieties on the Photosynthetic Characteristics and Yield Formation of Maize in High-Latitude Cold Regions

The high-latitude cold regions of northeastern China present scarce thermal resources, exhibit a short frost-free period, and lack high-yielding maize (Zea mays L.) varieties suitable for dense planting. These factors have long constrained the realization of maize yield potential under dense planting conditions. This study investigated the effects of intercropping maize varieties with different growth periods on the photosynthetic performance, yield formation, and interspecific competition. The long-season varieties Zhengdan958 (ZD958) and Xianyu335 (XY335), which are representative of the region, were intercropped with the shorter-season variety Yinongyu10 (YNY10), six intercropping row ratios (6:6, 4:4, 2:2, 1:1, 0:1, and 1:0) were set, and monoculture plots (0:1 and 1:0) were used as the controls. The results indicated that as the row ratio decreased in the intercropped plots, the leaf area index, relative leaf chlorophyll content, photosynthetic rate, stomatal conductance, and transpiration rate increased while the intercellular CO2 concentration gradually decreased compared with those in the monoculture plots. Simultaneously, dry matter accumulation, allocation, transport efficiency, 100-kernel weight, number of kernels per ear, and grain yield progressively increased, reaching maximum values at a 1:1 intercropping row ratio. Conversely, YNY10 in the intercropped plots exhibited opposite trends in these parameters. The land equivalent ratios for all intercropped row ratios exceeded 1. During the 2023–2024 growing season, the composite population grain yield was significantly higher (p < 0.05) at an intercropping row ratio of 1:1 for ZD958 (4.11–4.26%) and XY335 (3.54–3.65%) compared with the monoculture treatments, demonstrating the strong yield advantage of intercropping. Furthermore, in the intercropping systems, ZD958 and XY335 exhibited positive aggressivity and a competitive ratio greater than 1, thus showing stronger competitive ability than YNY10. Moreover, the increased grain yield of ZD958 and XY335 effectively compensated for the ecological disadvantages of YNY10, thereby leveraging the synergistic effects of close planting and intercropping patterns to promote improvements in maize composite population productivity.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Agronomy
Published
2025-10-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy15112505
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Agronomic Practices and Intercropping Systems
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.90

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Effects of Intercropping Long- and Short-Season Varieties on the Photosynthetic Characteristics and Yield Formation of Maize in High-Latitude Cold Regions

Xinggui Tian, Mukai Li, Zheming Wang, Mingyi Guo et al.
1 citations
Agronomy
Agronomic Practices and Intercropping Systems
1.90
article

Effects of Intercropping Long- and Short-Season Varieties on the Photosynthetic Characteristics and Yield Formation of Maize in High-Latitude Cold Regions

Xinggui Tian, Mukai Li, Zheming Wang, Mingyi Guo, Kejun Yang, Song Yu, Jia An, Junjun Hou, Shiqiang Yu, Lin Hong Ming, Yifei Zhang, Chunyu Zhang, Junhao Liu, Fengming Li, Shanshan Xiao
article en
1 citations

Abstract

The high-latitude cold regions of northeastern China present scarce thermal resources, exhibit a short frost-free period, and lack high-yielding maize (Zea mays L.) varieties suitable for dense planting. These factors have long constrained the realization of maize yield potential under dense planting conditions. This study investigated the effects of intercropping maize varieties with different growth periods on the photosynthetic performance, yield formation, and interspecific competition. The long-season varieties Zhengdan958 (ZD958) and Xianyu335 (XY335), which are representative of the region, were intercropped with the shorter-season variety Yinongyu10 (YNY10), six intercropping row ratios (6:6, 4:4, 2:2, 1:1, 0:1, and 1:0) were set, and monoculture plots (0:1 and 1:0) were used as the controls. The results indicated that as the row ratio decreased in the intercropped plots, the leaf area index, relative leaf chlorophyll content, photosynthetic rate, stomatal conductance, and transpiration rate increased while the intercellular CO2 concentration gradually decreased compared with those in the monoculture plots. Simultaneously, dry matter accumulation, allocation, transport efficiency, 100-kernel weight, number of kernels per ear, and grain yield progressively increased, reaching maximum values at a 1:1 intercropping row ratio. Conversely, YNY10 in the intercropped plots exhibited opposite trends in these parameters. The land equivalent ratios for all intercropped row ratios exceeded 1. During the 2023–2024 growing season, the composite population grain yield was significantly higher (p < 0.05) at an intercropping row ratio of 1:1 for ZD958 (4.11–4.26%) and XY335 (3.54–3.65%) compared with the monoculture treatments, demonstrating the strong yield advantage of intercropping. Furthermore, in the intercropping systems, ZD958 and XY335 exhibited positive aggressivity and a competitive ratio greater than 1, thus showing stronger competitive ability than YNY10. Moreover, the increased grain yield of ZD958 and XY335 effectively compensated for the ecological disadvantages of YNY10, thereby leveraging the synergistic effects of close planting and intercropping patterns to promote improvements in maize composite population productivity.

AgronomyVol. 15(11)
Heilongjiang Provincial Academy of Agricultural Sciences (CN), Heilongjiang Bayi Agricultural University (CN), Heilongjiang Academy of Land Reclamation Sciences (CN)
Heilongjiang Bayi Agricultural University, National Key Research and Development Program of China
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Agronomic Practices and Intercropping Systems
1.90
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.