PCT vs. FEP: A Comparison Between Reorganization Theory and Bayesian Inference

Perceptual Control Theory (PCT) and the Free Energy Principle (FEP) are two foundational, principle-based frameworks originally developed to explain brain function. However, since their initial proposals, both frameworks have been generalized to account for the behavior of living systems more broadly. Despite their conceptual overlap and practical successes, a mathematical comparison of the two frameworks has yet to be undertaken. In this article, we briefly introduce and compare the philosophical foundations underlying PCT and FEP. We then introduce and compare their experimental and mathematical foundations concretely in the context of bacterial chemotaxis. With these foundations in place, we can use tools from category theory to argue that PCT can be formally understood as a subset of the FEP framework; however, it is worth noting that the mathematical machinery unique to FEP is not required to successfully model bacterial chemotaxis. Finally, we conclude with a proposal for a mathematical synthesis where each framework plays an orthogonal yet complementary role.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Foundations
Published
2025-10-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/foundations5040035
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Embodied and Extended Cognition
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.43
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

PCT vs. FEP: A Comparison Between Reorganization Theory and Bayesian Inference

Warren Mansell, Rodrigo F. O. Pena, Ty Roachford
1 citations
Foundations
Embodied and Extended Cognition
1.43
article

PCT vs. FEP: A Comparison Between Reorganization Theory and Bayesian Inference

Warren Mansell, Rodrigo F. O. Pena, Ty Roachford
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Perceptual Control Theory (PCT) and the Free Energy Principle (FEP) are two foundational, principle-based frameworks originally developed to explain brain function. However, since their initial proposals, both frameworks have been generalized to account for the behavior of living systems more broadly. Despite their conceptual overlap and practical successes, a mathematical comparison of the two frameworks has yet to be undertaken. In this article, we briefly introduce and compare the philosophical foundations underlying PCT and FEP. We then introduce and compare their experimental and mathematical foundations concretely in the context of bacterial chemotaxis. With these foundations in place, we can use tools from category theory to argue that PCT can be formally understood as a subset of the FEP framework; however, it is worth noting that the mathematical machinery unique to FEP is not required to successfully model bacterial chemotaxis. Finally, we conclude with a proposal for a mathematical synthesis where each framework plays an orthogonal yet complementary role.

FoundationsVol. 5(4)
Curtin University (AU), Florida Atlantic University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 14%
Embodied and Extended Cognition
1.43
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

PCT vs. FEP: A Comparison Between Reorganization Theory and Bayesian Inference — Warren Mansell, Rodrigo F. O. Pena, et al. · Foundations (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS