Does Surgeon Experience Influence Surgical Safety and Patient Satisfaction After Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion? A Prospective Multicenter Comparison Study Between Non-Board-Certified and Board-Certified Spine Surgeons

Study DesignProspective multicenter cohort study.ObjectiveTo evaluate the impact of surgeon experience on surgical safety, radiographic outcomes, and patient-reported outcomes (PROMs) following anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) in patients with cervical degenerative disc disease (CDDD).MethodsThis prospective cohort study was conducted at five spine-specialized institutions in Japan. A total of 208 patients with CDDD who underwent ACDF between 2019 and 2022 were enrolled. Procedures were performed by either board-certified spine (BCS) surgeons (n = 150) or non-BCS (NBCS) surgeons (n = 58) under direct BCS supervision. Demographics, surgical variables, radiographic outcomes, and clinical results were compared. Evaluations included surgical duration, estimated blood loss (EBL), complications, cervical alignment and range of motion (ROM), Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) scores, Visual Analog Scale (VAS), JOACMEQ, and SF-36 scores.ResultsSurgical duration was comparable between groups, but EBL was significantly greater in the NBCS group (20.2 ± 35.0 mL vs 12.2 ± 13.7 mL, <i>P</i> = .020). Complication rates were low and similar. No major adverse events occurred in either group. Cervical alignment was maintained, and ROM slightly decreased postoperatively without intergroup differences. Both groups showed significant neurological improvement. Gains in JOA scores, reductions in VAS scores, and improvements in JOACMEQ and SF-36 scores were comparable.ConclusionsACDF performed by NBCS surgeons under BCS supervision achieved clinical outcomes equivalent to those by BCS surgeons. These findings underscore the effectiveness of structured supervision in ensuring surgical safety and fostering competency in spine surgery.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Global Spine Journal
Published
2025-10-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/21925682251392216
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Cervical and Thoracic Myelopathy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.01
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Does Surgeon Experience Influence Surgical Safety and Patient Satisfaction After Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion? A Prospective Multicenter Comparison Study Between Non-Board-Certified and Board-Certified Spine Surgeons

Satoshi Suzuki, Takeshi Fujii, Narihito Nagoshi, Masaya Nakamura et al.
1 citations
Global Spine Journal
Cervical and Thoracic Myelopathy
2.01
article

Does Surgeon Experience Influence Surgical Safety and Patient Satisfaction After Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion? A Prospective Multicenter Comparison Study Between Non-Board-Certified and Board-Certified Spine Surgeons

Satoshi Suzuki, Takeshi Fujii, Narihito Nagoshi, Masaya Nakamura, Reo Shibata, Masahiro Ozaki, Kentaro Ago, Takahito Iga, Norihiro Isogai, Toshiki Okubo, Junichi Yamane, Morio Matsumoto, Kota Watanabe, Kazuki Takeda, Takahiro Kitagawa, Yosuke Horiuchi
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Study DesignProspective multicenter cohort study.ObjectiveTo evaluate the impact of surgeon experience on surgical safety, radiographic outcomes, and patient-reported outcomes (PROMs) following anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) in patients with cervical degenerative disc disease (CDDD).MethodsThis prospective cohort study was conducted at five spine-specialized institutions in Japan. A total of 208 patients with CDDD who underwent ACDF between 2019 and 2022 were enrolled. Procedures were performed by either board-certified spine (BCS) surgeons (n = 150) or non-BCS (NBCS) surgeons (n = 58) under direct BCS supervision. Demographics, surgical variables, radiographic outcomes, and clinical results were compared. Evaluations included surgical duration, estimated blood loss (EBL), complications, cervical alignment and range of motion (ROM), Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) scores, Visual Analog Scale (VAS), JOACMEQ, and SF-36 scores.ResultsSurgical duration was comparable between groups, but EBL was significantly greater in the NBCS group (20.2 ± 35.0 mL vs 12.2 ± 13.7 mL, <i>P</i> = .020). Complication rates were low and similar. No major adverse events occurred in either group. Cervical alignment was maintained, and ROM slightly decreased postoperatively without intergroup differences. Both groups showed significant neurological improvement. Gains in JOA scores, reductions in VAS scores, and improvements in JOACMEQ and SF-36 scores were comparable.ConclusionsACDF performed by NBCS surgeons under BCS supervision achieved clinical outcomes equivalent to those by BCS surgeons. These findings underscore the effectiveness of structured supervision in ensuring surgical safety and fostering competency in spine surgery.

Global Spine Journal
Keio University (JP), Kanagawa Prefectural Police Department (JP), Murayama Medical Center (JP), National Hospital Organization (JP), keiyu Hospital (JP), Social Insurance Saitama Chuo Hospital (JP), Mita Hospital (JP), Saitama Medical University (JP)
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Cervical and Thoracic Myelopathy
2.01
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.