Extending OpenMC validation to spent fuel canisters: A criticality benchmark against MCNP

OpenMC is an open-source Monte Carlo code with increasing relevance in criticality safety and reactor physics applications. While its validation has covered a broad range of systems, its performance in spent nuclear fuel storage scenarios remains limited in the literature. This work benchmarks OpenMC against MCNP for eleven configurations based on the KBS-3 disposal concept, involving variations in geometry, fuel composition (fresh vs. spent), and environmental conditions (e.g., air, argon, flooding scenarios). Effective multiplication factors ( k eff ) and leakage fractions were evaluated for both codes. Across all cases, OpenMC systematically yielded slightly lower k eff values than MCNP, with absolute code-to-code differences bounded by 136 ( 10 ) pcm. In the normal-operation configurations, differences were − 32 ( 3 ) pcm (spent) and − 38 ( 3 ) pcm (fresh), with negligible leakage. Under periodic boundary conditions, both codes showed the expected boundary-induced rise in k eff ; for both OpenMC and MCNP, the increase relative to vacuum was + 237 ( 3 ) pcm. By providing reproducible input decks and quantifying agreement under equivalent modeling assumptions, this study represents the first systematic OpenMC–MCNP benchmark for KBS-3–type spent fuel canisters. These findings support extending the validation domain of OpenMC toward spent fuel transport and geological disposal applications.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Nuclear Engineering and Technology
Published
2025-10-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.net.2025.103999
Primary Topic
Physical Unclonable Functions (PUFs) and Hardware Security
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Extending OpenMC validation to spent fuel canisters: A criticality benchmark against MCNP

Franco López-Usquiano, F. Molina, J. Romero-Barrientos, Marcelo Zambra et al.
Nuclear Engineering and Technology
Physical Unclonable Functions (PUFs) and Hardware Security
article

Extending OpenMC validation to spent fuel canisters: A criticality benchmark against MCNP

Franco López-Usquiano, F. Molina, J. Romero-Barrientos, Marcelo Zambra, Javier Ruiz-Pineda
article en

Abstract

OpenMC is an open-source Monte Carlo code with increasing relevance in criticality safety and reactor physics applications. While its validation has covered a broad range of systems, its performance in spent nuclear fuel storage scenarios remains limited in the literature. This work benchmarks OpenMC against MCNP for eleven configurations based on the KBS-3 disposal concept, involving variations in geometry, fuel composition (fresh vs. spent), and environmental conditions (e.g., air, argon, flooding scenarios). Effective multiplication factors ( k eff ) and leakage fractions were evaluated for both codes. Across all cases, OpenMC systematically yielded slightly lower k eff values than MCNP, with absolute code-to-code differences bounded by 136 ( 10 ) pcm. In the normal-operation configurations, differences were − 32 ( 3 ) pcm (spent) and − 38 ( 3 ) pcm (fresh), with negligible leakage. Under periodic boundary conditions, both codes showed the expected boundary-induced rise in k eff ; for both OpenMC and MCNP, the increase relative to vacuum was + 237 ( 3 ) pcm. By providing reproducible input decks and quantifying agreement under equivalent modeling assumptions, this study represents the first systematic OpenMC–MCNP benchmark for KBS-3–type spent fuel canisters. These findings support extending the validation domain of OpenMC toward spent fuel transport and geological disposal applications.

Nuclear Engineering and TechnologyVol. 58(3)
Universidad Andrés Bello (CL), Millennium Science Initiative (CL), Comisión Chilena de Energía Nuclear (CL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 66%
Physical Unclonable Functions (PUFs) and Hardware Security
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.