Navigating Sub-Saharan African Just and Low-Carbon Transitions: Integrated Governance Approaches in Kenya and South Africa

Abstract Aligning the implementation of climate efforts under the Paris Agreement with the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) is essential to ensuring socially just green transitions. Yet, in sub-Saharan Africa, national approaches to green transitions vary widely, particularly in how they integrate poverty reduction into climate action. Prevailing theories of policy integration frame such variation as a function of effective institutional and policy design. I advance an alternative explanation: that integration outcomes are shaped by contestations in rule- and norm-setting processes within a fragmented global environmental governance structure. I probe the plausibility of this argument by studying the co-constitutive interplay of structure and agency in two illustrative cases’ just transitions: South Africa and Kenya. I find that dominant actor coalitions strategically leverage the global environmental governance structure to reinforce liberal environmentalism as the core norm of the climate regime. The resulting, incremental changes to the core norm ultimately constrain the integration of poverty reduction into climate action in just transitions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Global Environmental Politics
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1162/glep.a.15
Primary Topic
Sustainability and Climate Change Governance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Navigating Sub-Saharan African Just and Low-Carbon Transitions: Integrated Governance Approaches in Kenya and South Africa

Eszter Szedlacsek
Global Environmental Politics
Sustainability and Climate Change Governance
article

Navigating Sub-Saharan African Just and Low-Carbon Transitions: Integrated Governance Approaches in Kenya and South Africa

Eszter Szedlacsek
article en

Abstract

Abstract Aligning the implementation of climate efforts under the Paris Agreement with the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) is essential to ensuring socially just green transitions. Yet, in sub-Saharan Africa, national approaches to green transitions vary widely, particularly in how they integrate poverty reduction into climate action. Prevailing theories of policy integration frame such variation as a function of effective institutional and policy design. I advance an alternative explanation: that integration outcomes are shaped by contestations in rule- and norm-setting processes within a fragmented global environmental governance structure. I probe the plausibility of this argument by studying the co-constitutive interplay of structure and agency in two illustrative cases’ just transitions: South Africa and Kenya. I find that dominant actor coalitions strategically leverage the global environmental governance structure to reinforce liberal environmentalism as the core norm of the climate regime. The resulting, incremental changes to the core norm ultimately constrain the integration of poverty reduction into climate action in just transitions.

Global Environmental PoliticsVol. 25(4)
Université Paris 1 Panthéon-Sorbonne (FR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 71%
Sustainability and Climate Change Governance
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Navigating Sub-Saharan African Just and Low-Carbon Transitions: Integrated Governance Approaches in Kenya and South Africa — Eszter Szedlacsek · Global Environmental Politics (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS