Who’s Steering Whom and in What Direction? An Experiment on AI Versus Top Management Decision-Making in Projects

Employing classical and behavioral decision theories, this article explores, based on decision cases, how decisions by AI and humans might differ in the context of top management decision-making in projects. Based on a phenomenological analysis of 37 top managers’ responses and corresponding answers provided by artificial intelligence (AI), findings indicate that, as project decision-making becomes hybrid, systematic differences in important dimensions have the potential to steer projects into different directions. Aimed at provoking thought, this pioneering article proposes a conceptual framework for project decision-making in the age of generative AI (GenAI) and highlights theoretical and practical implications of carelessly delegating big decisions to AI.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Project Management Journal
Published
2025-10-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/87569728251379338
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Innovation, Sustainability, Human-Machine Systems
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.20
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Who’s Steering Whom and in What Direction? An Experiment on AI Versus Top Management Decision-Making in Projects

Lourdes Cános Darós, Dominik Kögel, Sandro Meile
1 citations
Project Management Journal
Innovation, Sustainability, Human-Machine Systems
4.20
article

Who’s Steering Whom and in What Direction? An Experiment on AI Versus Top Management Decision-Making in Projects

Lourdes Cános Darós, Dominik Kögel, Sandro Meile
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Employing classical and behavioral decision theories, this article explores, based on decision cases, how decisions by AI and humans might differ in the context of top management decision-making in projects. Based on a phenomenological analysis of 37 top managers’ responses and corresponding answers provided by artificial intelligence (AI), findings indicate that, as project decision-making becomes hybrid, systematic differences in important dimensions have the potential to steer projects into different directions. Aimed at provoking thought, this pioneering article proposes a conceptual framework for project decision-making in the age of generative AI (GenAI) and highlights theoretical and practical implications of carelessly delegating big decisions to AI.

Project Management JournalVol. 57(2)
Ansbach University of Applied Sciences (DE), Universitat Politècnica de València (ES)
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Innovation, Sustainability, Human-Machine Systems
4.20
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.