Understanding AI implementation in HR: a multimethod study in India's IT sector

Purpose This study aims to explore the drivers of artificial intelligence (AI) implementation in human resource (HR) processes from the dual perspective of senior HR professionals (thought leaders who decide implementation), and middle- and lower-level HR professionals (agents who carry out implementation). Design/methodology/approach Using a multi-method approach, we conducted two studies in the Indian information technology (IT) sector. In qualitative Study 1, interviews with 11 senior HR professionals were conducted to gauge their perspectives on AI implementation. For quantitative Study 2, we used the dimensions from study 1 to craft the conceptual framework using the theoretical lens of unified theory of acceptance and use of technology (UTAUT). Survey data of 200 middle and lower-level HR professionals were analyzed using structural equation modelling and PROCESS macro. Findings Using Gioia’s methodology, we found five aggregate dimensions influencing AI-HR implementation: performance gains, usability, organizational support, attitude, and intention to use. In Study 2, performance gains significantly predicted HR professionals’ intention to use AI, while usability did not. Attitude served as a significant mediator, linking both performance gains and usability to intention to use. Organizational support emerged as a critical boundary condition that moderated the mediation effect (usability-attitude-intention), such that higher organizational support strengthened HR professionals’ positive attitudes towards AI. Practical implications Firms should enhance organizational support and develop mechanisms to foster AI–human collaboration. Originality/value This study uses a multi-method approach by taking the dual perspectives of senior HR professionals and middle and lower-level HR professionals in an underrepresented country context India.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Organizational Effectiveness People and Performance
Published
2025-10-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1108/joepp-08-2025-0658
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.73
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Understanding AI implementation in HR: a multimethod study in India's IT sector

Sehrish Shahid, Santoshi Sengupta, Akanksha Jaiswal, Spardha Bisht
2 citations
Journal of Organizational Effectiveness People and Performance
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
4.73
article

Understanding AI implementation in HR: a multimethod study in India's IT sector

Sehrish Shahid, Santoshi Sengupta, Akanksha Jaiswal, Spardha Bisht
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Purpose This study aims to explore the drivers of artificial intelligence (AI) implementation in human resource (HR) processes from the dual perspective of senior HR professionals (thought leaders who decide implementation), and middle- and lower-level HR professionals (agents who carry out implementation). Design/methodology/approach Using a multi-method approach, we conducted two studies in the Indian information technology (IT) sector. In qualitative Study 1, interviews with 11 senior HR professionals were conducted to gauge their perspectives on AI implementation. For quantitative Study 2, we used the dimensions from study 1 to craft the conceptual framework using the theoretical lens of unified theory of acceptance and use of technology (UTAUT). Survey data of 200 middle and lower-level HR professionals were analyzed using structural equation modelling and PROCESS macro. Findings Using Gioia’s methodology, we found five aggregate dimensions influencing AI-HR implementation: performance gains, usability, organizational support, attitude, and intention to use. In Study 2, performance gains significantly predicted HR professionals’ intention to use AI, while usability did not. Attitude served as a significant mediator, linking both performance gains and usability to intention to use. Organizational support emerged as a critical boundary condition that moderated the mediation effect (usability-attitude-intention), such that higher organizational support strengthened HR professionals’ positive attitudes towards AI. Practical implications Firms should enhance organizational support and develop mechanisms to foster AI–human collaboration. Originality/value This study uses a multi-method approach by taking the dual perspectives of senior HR professionals and middle and lower-level HR professionals in an underrepresented country context India.

Journal of Organizational Effectiveness People and Performance
Loyola University Maryland (US), MIT University (MK), Universidad Loyola (BO), Loyola Medicine (US), Graphic Era University (IN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
4.73
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.