E6/E7 Similarity to Human Papillomavirus Prototypes and Performance of HPV Testing by Cobas 4800 HPV Test and Anyplex II HPV HR

Human papillomavirus (HPV) genotype classification relies on DNA sequence similarity to reference (prototype) sequences. Most HPV assays used for cervical cancer screening were clinically validated against European HPV prototypes. However, the impact of HPV sequence polymorphisms on test performance remains unexplored. We evaluated whether sequence variation in E6/E7 relative to HPV prototypes affects test performance by analyzing cervicovaginal samples from 990 women enrolled (2019-2022) across Belgium, Portugal, Brazil and Ecuador. Samples were tested using cobas, Anyplex, and next-generation sequencing (Ampliseq/Ion Torrent targeting E6/E7). Sequence variation was defined as the proportion of single nucleotide polymorphisms across E6/E7 relative to reference sequence. Sequence variation was, on average, higher in HPV-negative than HPV-positive samples for HPV16 (0.46% vs 0.13%) and HPV18 (0.44% vs 0.37%) using cobas. Similar patterns were observed with Anyplex (HPV16: 0.78% vs 0.13%, HPV33: 0.66% vs 0.40%, HPV58: 0.79% vs 0.53, and HPV66: 1.14% vs 0.25%). For HPV45, sequence variation was, on average, higher in HPV-positive than HPV-negative samples when tested with Anyplex (0.87% vs 0.43%). For HPV types 18, 31, 35, 39, 51, 52, 56, 59 and 68, the mean sequence variation was similar between HPV-negative and HPV-positive samples using Anyplex. Our findings show that sequence variation relative to prototypes may impact test performance.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Medical Virology
Published
2025-10-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/jmv.70668
Primary Topic
Cervical Cancer and HPV Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

E6/E7 Similarity to Human Papillomavirus Prototypes and Performance of HPV Testing by Cobas 4800 HPV Test and Anyplex II HPV HR

Adhemar Longatto‐Filho, Laila Sara Arroyo Mühr, Elizaveta Padalko, Piet Cools et al.
Journal of Medical Virology
Cervical Cancer and HPV Research
article

E6/E7 Similarity to Human Papillomavirus Prototypes and Performance of HPV Testing by Cobas 4800 HPV Test and Anyplex II HPV HR

Adhemar Longatto‐Filho, Laila Sara Arroyo Mühr, Elizaveta Padalko, Piet Cools, Bo Verberckmoes, Olivier Degomme, Luani Rezende Godoy, Mariam El‐Zein, Heleen Vermandere, Milan S. Stosic, Eduardo Luis Franco
article en

Abstract

Human papillomavirus (HPV) genotype classification relies on DNA sequence similarity to reference (prototype) sequences. Most HPV assays used for cervical cancer screening were clinically validated against European HPV prototypes. However, the impact of HPV sequence polymorphisms on test performance remains unexplored. We evaluated whether sequence variation in E6/E7 relative to HPV prototypes affects test performance by analyzing cervicovaginal samples from 990 women enrolled (2019-2022) across Belgium, Portugal, Brazil and Ecuador. Samples were tested using cobas, Anyplex, and next-generation sequencing (Ampliseq/Ion Torrent targeting E6/E7). Sequence variation was defined as the proportion of single nucleotide polymorphisms across E6/E7 relative to reference sequence. Sequence variation was, on average, higher in HPV-negative than HPV-positive samples for HPV16 (0.46% vs 0.13%) and HPV18 (0.44% vs 0.37%) using cobas. Similar patterns were observed with Anyplex (HPV16: 0.78% vs 0.13%, HPV33: 0.66% vs 0.40%, HPV58: 0.79% vs 0.53, and HPV66: 1.14% vs 0.25%). For HPV45, sequence variation was, on average, higher in HPV-positive than HPV-negative samples when tested with Anyplex (0.87% vs 0.43%). For HPV types 18, 31, 35, 39, 51, 52, 56, 59 and 68, the mean sequence variation was similar between HPV-negative and HPV-positive samples using Anyplex. Our findings show that sequence variation relative to prototypes may impact test performance.

Journal of Medical VirologyVol. 97(11)
HOGENT University of Applied Sciences and Arts (BE), Karolinska University Hospital (SE), Universidade de São Paulo (BR), OsloMet – Oslo Metropolitan University (NO), Akershus University Hospital (NO), Ghent University Hospital (BE), McGill University Health Centre (CA), Ghent University (BE), International Centre for Reproductive Health (MZ), Hospital de Câncer de Barretos (BR), McGill University (CA), University of Minho (PT)
Hospital de Câncer de Barretos, European Commission, Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo, Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior, Universitair Ziekenhuis Gent, Universiteit Gent, Universidad de Cuenca
Openalex Percentile: Top 58%
Cervical Cancer and HPV Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.