Efficacy and safety of doxorubicin–ifosfamide versus gemcitabine–docetaxel as first‐line therapy in advanced nonuterine leiomyosarcoma: A multicenter real‐world study

Nonuterine leiomyosarcoma (NU-LMS) is a rare and biologically distinct subtype of soft tissue sarcoma (STS) with clinical behavior differing from that of uterine leiomyosarcoma. In advanced or metastatic STS, immunotherapy has demonstrated only modest activity, and chemotherapy remains the cornerstone of treatment. However, there is a persistent unmet need for more effective and better-tolerated options in this population. This multicenter, retrospective study included 150 patients with histologically confirmed metastatic NU-LMS who received first-line doxorubicin-ifosfamide (AI) or gemcitabine-docetaxel (GD) at 26 oncology centers in Turkey between 2010 and 2024. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS). Survival was analyzed using Kaplan-Meier estimates and Cox proportional hazards models. Of 150 patients, 79 received AI and 71 received GD. Median OS for the entire cohort was 21.0 months. Median OS was 22.0 months with AI and 19.1 months with GD (p = .18), median progression-free survival was 7.3 versus 6.1 months (p = .66), and overall response rate was 25.3% versus 29.6% (p = .58), indicating no statistically significant differences in efficacy between the two regimens. Hematologic toxicities were less frequent with GD. AI and GD demonstrated comparable efficacy as first-line regimens for advanced or metastatic NU-LMS, with fewer hematologic toxicities observed for GD. Tumor location may have prognostic implications. These findings support individualized treatment selection and highlight the need for prospective studies in this rare and understudied sarcoma subtype, while the recent LMS-04 trial underscores the importance of future comparisons with doxorubicin-trabectedin to further refine first-line strategies in LMS.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Cancer
Published
2025-10-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/ijc.70212
Primary Topic
Sarcoma Diagnosis and Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Efficacy and safety of doxorubicin–ifosfamide versus gemcitabine–docetaxel as first‐line therapy in advanced nonuterine leiomyosarcoma: A multicenter real‐world study

Ilgın Koç Kuş, Ali Aytac, Irem Ugurlu, Bilgin Demir et al.
International Journal of Cancer
Sarcoma Diagnosis and Treatment
article

Efficacy and safety of doxorubicin–ifosfamide versus gemcitabine–docetaxel as first‐line therapy in advanced nonuterine leiomyosarcoma: A multicenter real‐world study

Ilgın Koç Kuş, Ali Aytac, Irem Ugurlu, Bilgin Demir, Haydar Çağatay Yüksel, Pınar Gürsoy, Zafer Arık, İlhan Hacıbekiroğlu, Alberto Terzi, Aslı Ece Solmaz, İbrahim Akın, Osman Sütçüoğlu, Teoman Şakalar, Esmanur Kaplan, Fatih Kuş, Ulus Ali Şanlı, Erdem Göker, Ahmet Halil Sevinç, Ertuğrul Bayram, Meltem Baykara, Havva Yesil, Caner Acar, Tolga Köşeci, Hamit Bal, Cengiz Karaçin, Ahmet Ünlü, Oktay Demirkıran, Elif Şahin, Ahmet Ünsal, Abdullah Sakin, A. Kuś, Sedat Biter, Salih Tünbekici, Galip Can Uyar, Duygu Özaşkın, Gökhan Şahin, Mustafa Dilek, Ceren Kabaoglu, Elisa Alves Ramos Zin, Mahmut Kara, Atilla Yıldırım, Alper Coşkun, Ibrahim Tunbekici, Mert Iscı, Gamze Emin, Ceren Mordag, Hasan Aslanhan
article en

Abstract

Nonuterine leiomyosarcoma (NU-LMS) is a rare and biologically distinct subtype of soft tissue sarcoma (STS) with clinical behavior differing from that of uterine leiomyosarcoma. In advanced or metastatic STS, immunotherapy has demonstrated only modest activity, and chemotherapy remains the cornerstone of treatment. However, there is a persistent unmet need for more effective and better-tolerated options in this population. This multicenter, retrospective study included 150 patients with histologically confirmed metastatic NU-LMS who received first-line doxorubicin-ifosfamide (AI) or gemcitabine-docetaxel (GD) at 26 oncology centers in Turkey between 2010 and 2024. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS). Survival was analyzed using Kaplan-Meier estimates and Cox proportional hazards models. Of 150 patients, 79 received AI and 71 received GD. Median OS for the entire cohort was 21.0 months. Median OS was 22.0 months with AI and 19.1 months with GD (p = .18), median progression-free survival was 7.3 versus 6.1 months (p = .66), and overall response rate was 25.3% versus 29.6% (p = .58), indicating no statistically significant differences in efficacy between the two regimens. Hematologic toxicities were less frequent with GD. AI and GD demonstrated comparable efficacy as first-line regimens for advanced or metastatic NU-LMS, with fewer hematologic toxicities observed for GD. Tumor location may have prognostic implications. These findings support individualized treatment selection and highlight the need for prospective studies in this rare and understudied sarcoma subtype, while the recent LMS-04 trial underscores the importance of future comparisons with doxorubicin-trabectedin to further refine first-line strategies in LMS.

International Journal of CancerVol. 158(6)
Sakarya University (TR), Van Yüzüncü Yıl Üniversitesi (TR), Dicle University (TR), Bursa Uludağ Üni̇versi̇tesi̇ (TR), Gümüşhane University (TR), Karadeniz Technical University (TR), Manisa Celal Bayar University (TR), Dokuz Eylül University (TR), Istanbul Medipol University (TR), Ege University (TR), Memorial Ankara Hospital (TR), Dr Lütfi Kırdar Kartal Eğitim ve Araştırma Hastanesi (TR), Ankara Onkoloji Eğitim ve Araştırma Hastanesi (TR), Antalya Eğitim ve Araştırma Hastanesi (TR), Medical Park Gaziantep Hospital (TR), Hacettepe University Hospital (TR), Sakarya Eğitim ve Araştırma Hastanesi (TR), Şanlıurfa Mehmet Akif İnan Eğitim ve Araştırma Hastanesi (TR), Sağlık Bilimleri Üniversitesi (TR), Afyonkarahisar Sağlık Bilimleri Üniversitesi, Kahramanmaraş Sütçü İmam University (TR), Pamukkale University (TR), Kocaeli Üniversitesi (TR), Afyon Kocatepe University (TR), Cukurova University (TR), Gaziantep University (TR), Adnan Menderes University (TR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 55%
Sarcoma Diagnosis and Treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.