A comparison of fecal output determined by total fecal collection or titanium dioxide in horses

Total fecal collection studies to determine digestibility of nutrients are costly and laborious. The use of externally dosed indigestible markers, such as titanium dioxide (TiO2), to estimate digestibility using spot samples could be advantageous, but studies validating their use in horses are inadequate. Two experiments were conducted to determine if TiO2 in fecal spot samples effectively estimated fecal output in horses. In Exp. 1, four mature horses were fed a forage-based diet (85:15 forage: concentrate) split into two equal meals with 1.75 ± 0.03 g TiO2/kg DM (10 g TiO2) per day top-dressed on their daily ration. Horses were fed the marker for 10 d before a 4-d total fecal collection period. Fecal samples were collected every 4 h to examine TiO2 excretion and calculate fecal output (cFO), which was compared to actual total fecal output (aFO). In Exp. 2, 15 horses were split into three dietary treatments: low forage (LO, 45% forage), medium forage (MED, 73% forage), and high forage (HI, 95% forage) diets. Daily rations were divided into three equal meals with 2 g TiO2/kg dry matter per day thoroughly mixed in their feed. The marker was fed for at least 12 d before a 5-d total fecal collection period, with spot samples obtained similarly to Exp. 1. In Exp. 1, cFO overestimated aFO by 10% (P < 0.05) across all horses and days. The aFO and cFO determined by fecal spot samples were poorly correlated (P > 0.10; R2 = 0.148). In Exp. 2, cFO was not different from aFO when averaged across all horses and days (P > 0.10), but there were differences (P < 0.05) between cFO and aFO for 10 out of 15 individual horses. In addition, compared to the MED and LO diets, mean fecal output calculated from TiO2 underestimated aFO (P < 0.05) for horses fed the HI diet. Due to a large amount of variation within horses, the use of TiO2 in fecal spot samples to estimate fecal output needs to be better optimized before its use can be recommended as an alternative to total fecal collections.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Animal Science
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/jas/skaf375
Primary Topic
Ruminant Nutrition and Digestive Physiology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A comparison of fecal output determined by total fecal collection or titanium dioxide in horses

A.L. Fowler, S. Hayes, M.B. Pyles, L.M. Lawrence et al.
Journal of Animal Science
Ruminant Nutrition and Digestive Physiology
article

A comparison of fecal output determined by total fecal collection or titanium dioxide in horses

A.L. Fowler, S. Hayes, M.B. Pyles, L.M. Lawrence, Andrea D. Crum
article en

Abstract

Total fecal collection studies to determine digestibility of nutrients are costly and laborious. The use of externally dosed indigestible markers, such as titanium dioxide (TiO2), to estimate digestibility using spot samples could be advantageous, but studies validating their use in horses are inadequate. Two experiments were conducted to determine if TiO2 in fecal spot samples effectively estimated fecal output in horses. In Exp. 1, four mature horses were fed a forage-based diet (85:15 forage: concentrate) split into two equal meals with 1.75 ± 0.03 g TiO2/kg DM (10 g TiO2) per day top-dressed on their daily ration. Horses were fed the marker for 10 d before a 4-d total fecal collection period. Fecal samples were collected every 4 h to examine TiO2 excretion and calculate fecal output (cFO), which was compared to actual total fecal output (aFO). In Exp. 2, 15 horses were split into three dietary treatments: low forage (LO, 45% forage), medium forage (MED, 73% forage), and high forage (HI, 95% forage) diets. Daily rations were divided into three equal meals with 2 g TiO2/kg dry matter per day thoroughly mixed in their feed. The marker was fed for at least 12 d before a 5-d total fecal collection period, with spot samples obtained similarly to Exp. 1. In Exp. 1, cFO overestimated aFO by 10% (P < 0.05) across all horses and days. The aFO and cFO determined by fecal spot samples were poorly correlated (P > 0.10; R2 = 0.148). In Exp. 2, cFO was not different from aFO when averaged across all horses and days (P > 0.10), but there were differences (P < 0.05) between cFO and aFO for 10 out of 15 individual horses. In addition, compared to the MED and LO diets, mean fecal output calculated from TiO2 underestimated aFO (P < 0.05) for horses fed the HI diet. Due to a large amount of variation within horses, the use of TiO2 in fecal spot samples to estimate fecal output needs to be better optimized before its use can be recommended as an alternative to total fecal collections.

Journal of Animal ScienceVol. 103
University of Kentucky (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 58%
Ruminant Nutrition and Digestive Physiology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.