Quantifying Fire Risk Index in Chemical Industry Using Statistical Modeling Procedure

Fire incident reports contain detailed textual narratives that capture causal factors often overlooked in structured records, while financial damage amounts provide measurable outcomes of these events. Integrating these two sources of information is essential for uncovering interpretable links between descriptive causes and their economic consequences. To this end, we develop a data-driven framework that constructs a composite Risk Index, enabling systematic quantification of how specific keywords relate to property damage amounts. This index facilitates both the identification of high-impact terms and the aggregation of risks across semantically related clusters, thereby offering a principled measure of fire-related financial risk. Using more than a decade of Korean fire investigation reports on the chemical industry classified as Special Buildings (2013–2024), we employ topic modeling and network-based embedding to estimate semantic similarities from interactions among words, and subsequently apply Lasso regression to quantify their associations with property damage amounts, thereby estimating the fire risk index. This approach enables us to assess fire risk not only at the level of individual terms, but also within their broader textual context, where highly interactive related words provide insights into collective patterns of hazard representation and their potential impact on expected losses. The analysis highlights several domains of risk, including hazardous chemical leakage, unsafe storage practices, equipment and facility malfunctions, and environmentally induced ignition. The results demonstrate that text-derived indices provide interpretable and practically relevant insights, bridging unstructured narratives with structured loss information and offering a basis for evidence-based fire risk assessment and management. The derived Risk Index provides practical reference data for both safety management and insurance underwriting by enabling the prioritization of preventive measures within industrial sites and offering quantitative guidance for assessing facility-specific risk levels in insurance decisions. An R implementation of the proposed framework is openly available for public use.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Applied Sciences
Published
2025-10-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/app152111508
Primary Topic
Risk and Safety Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Quantifying Fire Risk Index in Chemical Industry Using Statistical Modeling Procedure

Seungil Ahn, Yeseul Jeon, Seung‐Ho Choi, Hyewon Jung
Applied Sciences
Risk and Safety Analysis
article

Quantifying Fire Risk Index in Chemical Industry Using Statistical Modeling Procedure

Seungil Ahn, Yeseul Jeon, Seung‐Ho Choi, Hyewon Jung
article en

Abstract

Fire incident reports contain detailed textual narratives that capture causal factors often overlooked in structured records, while financial damage amounts provide measurable outcomes of these events. Integrating these two sources of information is essential for uncovering interpretable links between descriptive causes and their economic consequences. To this end, we develop a data-driven framework that constructs a composite Risk Index, enabling systematic quantification of how specific keywords relate to property damage amounts. This index facilitates both the identification of high-impact terms and the aggregation of risks across semantically related clusters, thereby offering a principled measure of fire-related financial risk. Using more than a decade of Korean fire investigation reports on the chemical industry classified as Special Buildings (2013–2024), we employ topic modeling and network-based embedding to estimate semantic similarities from interactions among words, and subsequently apply Lasso regression to quantify their associations with property damage amounts, thereby estimating the fire risk index. This approach enables us to assess fire risk not only at the level of individual terms, but also within their broader textual context, where highly interactive related words provide insights into collective patterns of hazard representation and their potential impact on expected losses. The analysis highlights several domains of risk, including hazardous chemical leakage, unsafe storage practices, equipment and facility malfunctions, and environmentally induced ignition. The results demonstrate that text-derived indices provide interpretable and practically relevant insights, bridging unstructured narratives with structured loss information and offering a basis for evidence-based fire risk assessment and management. The derived Risk Index provides practical reference data for both safety management and insurance underwriting by enabling the prioritization of preventive measures within industrial sites and offering quantitative guidance for assessing facility-specific risk levels in insurance decisions. An R implementation of the proposed framework is openly available for public use.

Applied SciencesVol. 15(21)
University of California, San Francisco (US), Texas A&M University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 69%
Risk and Safety Analysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.