Trust in institutions and misinformation susceptibility both independently explain vaccine skepticism

Herd immunity for preventable childhood infectious diseases such as measles and mumps has come under threat in numerous countries, due to declining vaccination rates. This decline underscores the urgent need to understand the underlying mechanisms of vaccine skepticism. Institutional (dis)trust and belief in (vaccine) misinformation have been proposed as important factors, but their interconnectedness and potential mutual influence have remained elusive. Importantly, higher trust has been hypothesized to serve as a "buffer" against the adverse effects of misinformation belief. In this preregistered study (N = 1356, probability sample of Dutch households), we address these questions using validated, high-quality measures of vaccine attitudes, trust, and misinformation susceptibility. We find that specific trust in the government with respect to vaccinations is a much stronger predictor of vaccine skepticism than general trust in institutions. Moreover, susceptibility to misinformation is significantly associated with vaccine skepticism under all model specifications. Contrary to expectations, we find no evidence for the "buffer" hypothesis, suggesting that, while correlated, misinformation susceptibility and trust are distinctly related to vaccine skepticism.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Scientific Reports
Published
2025-10-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-21452-1
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Misinformation and Its Impacts
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
8.40

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Trust in institutions and misinformation susceptibility both independently explain vaccine skepticism

Mattijs Lambooij, Rakoen Maertens, Jon Roozenbeek, Mart van Dijk et al.
2 citations
Scientific Reports
Misinformation and Its Impacts
8.40
article

Trust in institutions and misinformation susceptibility both independently explain vaccine skepticism

Mattijs Lambooij, Rakoen Maertens, Jon Roozenbeek, Mart van Dijk, Sander van der Linden, Corinne van den Berg, José A. Ferreira, Thom Roozenbeek
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Herd immunity for preventable childhood infectious diseases such as measles and mumps has come under threat in numerous countries, due to declining vaccination rates. This decline underscores the urgent need to understand the underlying mechanisms of vaccine skepticism. Institutional (dis)trust and belief in (vaccine) misinformation have been proposed as important factors, but their interconnectedness and potential mutual influence have remained elusive. Importantly, higher trust has been hypothesized to serve as a "buffer" against the adverse effects of misinformation belief. In this preregistered study (N = 1356, probability sample of Dutch households), we address these questions using validated, high-quality measures of vaccine attitudes, trust, and misinformation susceptibility. We find that specific trust in the government with respect to vaccinations is a much stronger predictor of vaccine skepticism than general trust in institutions. Moreover, susceptibility to misinformation is significantly associated with vaccine skepticism under all model specifications. Contrary to expectations, we find no evidence for the "buffer" hypothesis, suggesting that, while correlated, misinformation susceptibility and trust are distinctly related to vaccine skepticism.

Scientific ReportsVol. 15(1)
University of Groningen (NL), King's College London (GB), University of Cambridge (GB), University of Oxford (GB), National Institute for Public Health and the Environment (NL), Erasmus University Rotterdam (NL)
Rijksuniversiteit Groningen, Rijksinstituut voor Volksgezondheid en Milieu
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Misinformation and Its Impacts
8.40
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.