Ultrasonic rewarming of cryopreserved alginate encapsulated liver spheroids

Rapid volumetric rewarming methods are needed to enable the effective cryopreservation and recovery of large volumes of biological cells for therapy and banking of tissues and organs. Ultrasonic rewarming is currently under development, but its effect on cells and their post-rewarming viability has not yet been established. Here, we compare ultrasonic rewarming with the gold-standard [Formula: see text]C water bath using cryovials containing cryopreserved alginate encapsulated liver spheroids. Mean rewarming rates are used to establish the exposure time to rewarm to [Formula: see text]C for higher power (100 W) and lower power (20 W) ultrasonic rewarming. These electrical powers correspond to free-field pressures along the central cryovial axis of 2.8 MPa and 1.3 MPa, respectively. Ultrasonic rewarming is faster than the gold-standard (120±5 s), taking 88 s (36% faster) and 34 s (350% faster) to rewarm to [Formula: see text]C with the lower and higher powers. We measure post-rewarming liver spheroid viability and viable cell number across the 96-h recovery period. The lower power improves viability by 1% and the higher power reduces viability by 2% on average, relative to the gold-standard. There were no significant differences in viable cell number between rewarming methods. Our findings will serve as a foundation for ultrasonic cryovial rewarming and demonstrates potential for scaling to larger volumes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Scientific Reports
Published
2025-10-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-21464-x
Primary Topic
Reproductive Biology and Fertility
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Ultrasonic rewarming of cryopreserved alginate encapsulated liver spheroids

Clare Selden, Eleanor Martin, Tom Brookshaw, Rui Xu et al.
Scientific Reports
Reproductive Biology and Fertility
article

Ultrasonic rewarming of cryopreserved alginate encapsulated liver spheroids

Clare Selden, Eleanor Martin, Tom Brookshaw, Rui Xu, Eloy Erro
article en

Abstract

Rapid volumetric rewarming methods are needed to enable the effective cryopreservation and recovery of large volumes of biological cells for therapy and banking of tissues and organs. Ultrasonic rewarming is currently under development, but its effect on cells and their post-rewarming viability has not yet been established. Here, we compare ultrasonic rewarming with the gold-standard [Formula: see text]C water bath using cryovials containing cryopreserved alginate encapsulated liver spheroids. Mean rewarming rates are used to establish the exposure time to rewarm to [Formula: see text]C for higher power (100 W) and lower power (20 W) ultrasonic rewarming. These electrical powers correspond to free-field pressures along the central cryovial axis of 2.8 MPa and 1.3 MPa, respectively. Ultrasonic rewarming is faster than the gold-standard (120±5 s), taking 88 s (36% faster) and 34 s (350% faster) to rewarm to [Formula: see text]C with the lower and higher powers. We measure post-rewarming liver spheroid viability and viable cell number across the 96-h recovery period. The lower power improves viability by 1% and the higher power reduces viability by 2% on average, relative to the gold-standard. There were no significant differences in viable cell number between rewarming methods. Our findings will serve as a foundation for ultrasonic cryovial rewarming and demonstrates potential for scaling to larger volumes.

Scientific ReportsVol. 15(1)
University College Hospital (GB), The Royal Free Hospital (GB), Wellcome / EPSRC Centre for Interventional and Surgical Sciences (GB), University College London (GB)
UK Research and Innovation, Wellcome / EPSRC Centre for Interventional and Surgical Sciences, Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council
Openalex Percentile: Top 59%
Reproductive Biology and Fertility
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.