Patient–Stakeholder Engagement for Patient-Centered Research on Sleep Apnea

AbstractIn 2016, many clinicians and investigators in the field of sleep apnea were surprised when a large multinational clinical trial of continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) therapy failed to demonstrate a reduction in cardiovascular events in patients with sleep apnea and established cardiovascular disease. When a review of the trial data suggested that CPAP nonadherence among trial participants might explain the negative results, it became clear that new approaches were needed. In this Clinical Trials Case Study, we share our experience designing a trial to evaluate a peer-support strategy to improve CPAP adherence. We address how patients were the drivers of research ideas and discuss how the return on investment in such patient-engaged approaches to research can be high for patients, trialists, and, ultimately, public health. Our experience could serve as a road map for investigators who have the same trepidation as we once did to create, engage, and empower a patient-stakeholder committee. Such knowledge could help clinical trials accomplish the stated goals for various chronic medical conditions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
NEJM Evidence
Published
2025-10-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1056/evidctcs2400397
Primary Topic
Obstructive Sleep Apnea Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Patient–Stakeholder Engagement for Patient-Centered Research on Sleep Apnea

Gilles Frydman, Sairam Parthasarathy
NEJM Evidence
Obstructive Sleep Apnea Research
article

Patient–Stakeholder Engagement for Patient-Centered Research on Sleep Apnea

Gilles Frydman, Sairam Parthasarathy
article en

Abstract

AbstractIn 2016, many clinicians and investigators in the field of sleep apnea were surprised when a large multinational clinical trial of continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) therapy failed to demonstrate a reduction in cardiovascular events in patients with sleep apnea and established cardiovascular disease. When a review of the trial data suggested that CPAP nonadherence among trial participants might explain the negative results, it became clear that new approaches were needed. In this Clinical Trials Case Study, we share our experience designing a trial to evaluate a peer-support strategy to improve CPAP adherence. We address how patients were the drivers of research ideas and discuss how the return on investment in such patient-engaged approaches to research can be high for patients, trialists, and, ultimately, public health. Our experience could serve as a road map for investigators who have the same trepidation as we once did to create, engage, and empower a patient-stakeholder committee. Such knowledge could help clinical trials accomplish the stated goals for various chronic medical conditions.

NEJM EvidenceVol. 4(11)
University of Arizona (US), Nia Association (US), Pulmonary and Allergy Associates (US), Center for Neurosciences (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 61%
Obstructive Sleep Apnea Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Patient–Stakeholder Engagement for Patient-Centered Research on Sleep Apnea — Gilles Frydman, Sairam Parthasarathy · NEJM Evidence (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS