Dynamic Screening and the Dual Roles of Monitoring

This paper studies monitoring in long-term, self-enforcing relationships with adverse selection and moral hazard. Monitoring is used to screen low types by incentivizing them to shirk. Once high types have been identified, monitoring is used both to incentivize effort from high types and to provide off-path (dis)incentives for low types looking to build a reputation. This results in a key trade-off: providing cost-efficient incentives to high types, versus screening low types faster. The optimal contract uses probation after screening: high types are excessively monitored to facilitate better screening. Monitoring declines as the agent's track record improves. (JEL D11, D82, D86)

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
American Economic Journal Microeconomics
Published
2025-10-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1257/mic.20230049
Primary Topic
Game Theory and Applications
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Dynamic Screening and the Dual Roles of Monitoring

Dhruva Bhaskar
American Economic Journal Microeconomics
Game Theory and Applications
article

Dynamic Screening and the Dual Roles of Monitoring

Dhruva Bhaskar
article en

Abstract

This paper studies monitoring in long-term, self-enforcing relationships with adverse selection and moral hazard. Monitoring is used to screen low types by incentivizing them to shirk. Once high types have been identified, monitoring is used both to incentivize effort from high types and to provide off-path (dis)incentives for low types looking to build a reputation. This results in a key trade-off: providing cost-efficient incentives to high types, versus screening low types faster. The optimal contract uses probation after screening: high types are excessively monitored to facilitate better screening. Monitoring declines as the agent's track record improves. (JEL D11, D82, D86)

American Economic Journal MicroeconomicsVol. 17(4)
Baruch College (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 64%
Game Theory and Applications
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.