Underestimating Learning by Doing

Many economic decisions, such as whether to invest in developing new skills, change professions, or purchase a technology, benefit from accurate estimation of skill acquisition. We examine the accuracy of such predictions by having study participants predict the speed at which they will master unfamiliar tasks. Across three studies involving two types of tasks and two levels of difficulty, we find systematic underestimation of learning, even after receiving feedback. In a fourth study, participants predicting others' performance showed significantly less underestimation, suggesting that projection bias—overreliance on immediate perceptions of effort and difficulty—may drive prediction errors. (JEL D83, J24)

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
American Economic Journal Microeconomics
Published
2025-10-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1257/mic.20240141
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.37
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Underestimating Learning by Doing

Samantha Horn, George Loewenstein
1 citations
American Economic Journal Microeconomics
Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies
2.37
article

Underestimating Learning by Doing

Samantha Horn, George Loewenstein
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Many economic decisions, such as whether to invest in developing new skills, change professions, or purchase a technology, benefit from accurate estimation of skill acquisition. We examine the accuracy of such predictions by having study participants predict the speed at which they will master unfamiliar tasks. Across three studies involving two types of tasks and two levels of difficulty, we find systematic underestimation of learning, even after receiving feedback. In a fourth study, participants predicting others' performance showed significantly less underestimation, suggesting that projection bias—overreliance on immediate perceptions of effort and difficulty—may drive prediction errors. (JEL D83, J24)

American Economic Journal MicroeconomicsVol. 17(4)
University of Chicago (US), Carnegie Mellon University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies
2.37
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Underestimating Learning by Doing — Samantha Horn, George Loewenstein · American Economic Journal Microeconomics (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS