Reddening the nighttime environment: Use of <scp>PC</scp> ‐amber <scp>LED</scp> lighting

Abstract The introduction of artificial light is changing the nighttime environment over large areas of the Earth, disrupting natural light regimes in terms of the occurrence, timing and forms of light. Because of the centrality of those natural light regimes to many biological processes, artificial light at night (ALAN) has quite pervasive environmental impacts, including on individual organisms, populations, communities and ecosystems. The widespread and ongoing introduction of Phosphor‐converted white (PC‐white) LEDs has particularly accelerated the disruption of natural light regimes and exacerbated many of the environmental impacts. In large part this is because of the resultant increased emissions in the blue part of the spectrum, to which key biological processes are especially sensitive. The use of Phosphor‐converted amber (PC‐amber) LEDs, with emissions in the blue much reduced and therefore in effect reddened compared with PC‐white LEDs, has been widely championed as a means of reducing (albeit not eliminating) these environmental impacts. Here we argue that, as things stand, the evidence for the efficacy of PC‐amber LEDs in such reductions is quite limited and that these lamps should not be seen as a panacea for the environmental impacts of ALAN. In particular, PC‐amber LEDs can still have substantial blue emissions and thus have greater biological impacts than might otherwise be assumed, especially if they are used at higher intensities. Other lighting options, which have thus far received little attention, may be more advantageous, especially if their availability improves and thus results in associated price reductions. However, more basic ways of limiting ALAN should remain high priorities, such as removing unnecessary lights, dimming lighting, improving shielding and part‐night lighting. Practical implication . Although they can provide benefits, caution should be exercised in the widespread use of PC‐amber LEDs as an environmentally sensitive solution to the installation of outdoor lighting.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Ecological Solutions and Evidence
Published
2025-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/2688-8319.70144
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Impact of Light on Environment and Health
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.21

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Reddening the nighttime environment: Use of PC ‐amber LED lighting

Sam Morrell, Jonathan Bennie, Kevin J. Gaston
2 citations
Ecological Solutions and Evidence
Impact of Light on Environment and Health
2.21
article

Reddening the nighttime environment: Use of PC ‐amber LED lighting

Sam Morrell, Jonathan Bennie, Kevin J. Gaston
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Abstract The introduction of artificial light is changing the nighttime environment over large areas of the Earth, disrupting natural light regimes in terms of the occurrence, timing and forms of light. Because of the centrality of those natural light regimes to many biological processes, artificial light at night (ALAN) has quite pervasive environmental impacts, including on individual organisms, populations, communities and ecosystems. The widespread and ongoing introduction of Phosphor‐converted white (PC‐white) LEDs has particularly accelerated the disruption of natural light regimes and exacerbated many of the environmental impacts. In large part this is because of the resultant increased emissions in the blue part of the spectrum, to which key biological processes are especially sensitive. The use of Phosphor‐converted amber (PC‐amber) LEDs, with emissions in the blue much reduced and therefore in effect reddened compared with PC‐white LEDs, has been widely championed as a means of reducing (albeit not eliminating) these environmental impacts. Here we argue that, as things stand, the evidence for the efficacy of PC‐amber LEDs in such reductions is quite limited and that these lamps should not be seen as a panacea for the environmental impacts of ALAN. In particular, PC‐amber LEDs can still have substantial blue emissions and thus have greater biological impacts than might otherwise be assumed, especially if they are used at higher intensities. Other lighting options, which have thus far received little attention, may be more advantageous, especially if their availability improves and thus results in associated price reductions. However, more basic ways of limiting ALAN should remain high priorities, such as removing unnecessary lights, dimming lighting, improving shielding and part‐night lighting. Practical implication . Although they can provide benefits, caution should be exercised in the widespread use of PC‐amber LEDs as an environmentally sensitive solution to the installation of outdoor lighting.

Ecological Solutions and EvidenceVol. 6(4)
University of Exeter (GB)
Natural Environment Research Council
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Impact of Light on Environment and Health
2.21
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.