Healthcare Policy‐Making Through the EU Recovery and Resilience Facility: A Multi‐Level Governance and Policy Design Approach

ABSTRACT The Recovery and Resilience Facility (RRF) has been a significant innovation in European Union (EU) governance and represents an opportunity to prioritize healthcare investments and reforms, among other policies. While much has been written about the EU post‐pandemic, particularly regarding the potential for changing the economic paradigm and triggering substantial domestic policy changes, the present article sheds light on the RRF through a multi‐level governance and policy design approach. The article combines the examination of the EU policy strategy at the top with the analysis of national and regional capacities and implementation programs at the bottom. By focusing on the Italian case, we shed light on the opportunities and limitations of both the RRF and the Italian National Recovery and Resilience Plan (NRRP). The design of both the RRF and NRRP reveals weaknesses that could hinder the success of the initiative.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Risk Hazards & Crisis in Public Policy
Published
2025-10-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/rhc3.70038
Primary Topic
Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Healthcare Policy‐Making Through the EU Recovery and Resilience Facility: A Multi‐Level Governance and Policy Design Approach

Andrea Terlizzi, Emmanuele Pavolini, David Natali
Risk Hazards & Crisis in Public Policy
Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
article

Healthcare Policy‐Making Through the EU Recovery and Resilience Facility: A Multi‐Level Governance and Policy Design Approach

Andrea Terlizzi, Emmanuele Pavolini, David Natali
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT The Recovery and Resilience Facility (RRF) has been a significant innovation in European Union (EU) governance and represents an opportunity to prioritize healthcare investments and reforms, among other policies. While much has been written about the EU post‐pandemic, particularly regarding the potential for changing the economic paradigm and triggering substantial domestic policy changes, the present article sheds light on the RRF through a multi‐level governance and policy design approach. The article combines the examination of the EU policy strategy at the top with the analysis of national and regional capacities and implementation programs at the bottom. By focusing on the Italian case, we shed light on the opportunities and limitations of both the RRF and the Italian National Recovery and Resilience Plan (NRRP). The design of both the RRF and NRRP reveals weaknesses that could hinder the success of the initiative.

Risk Hazards & Crisis in Public PolicyVol. 16(4)
Scuola Superiore Sant'Anna (IT), University of Milan (IT), New York University Florence (IT), University of Florence (IT)
Scuola Superiore Sant'Anna
Openalex Percentile: Top 60%
Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Healthcare Policy‐Making Through the EU Recovery and Resilience Facility: A Multi‐Level Governance and Policy Design Approach — Andrea Terlizzi, Emmanuele Pavolini, et al. · Risk Hazards & Crisis in Public Policy (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS