Validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the Regret Intensity Scale

This study aimed to evaluate the validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the Regret Intensity Scale, which assesses the regret experienced by nurses during the care process. This methodological study was conducted with 402 nurses. Data were collected using the Nurse Information Form, Regret Intensity Scale and Elements of Regret Scale. Language and content validity were assessed using the Content Validity Index. Construct validity was examined through exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses. Cronbach’s alpha coefficient, item-total score correlation, and Pearson correlation coefficient were used to assess reliability. Exploratory factor analysis (n = 193) showed a KMO value of 0.890 and a Bartlett’s test value of 1466.942 (p < 0.001). Factor loadings of the single-factor structure ranged from 0.737 to 0.865. Confirmatory factor analysis (n = 209) indicated good model fit (χ2/df = 2.338, RMSEA = 0.079, GFI = 0.95). The Cronbach’s alpha coefficient of the scale was 0.932 and all items ranged from 0.927 to 0.934. A statistically significant correlation was found with the Elements of Regret Scale (r = 0.490; p < 0.001). The Turkish version of the Regret Intensity Scale is a valid and reliable instrument for measuring the regret experienced by nurses in care processes. It is a practical tool for use in clinical practice and research to assess care-related regret in Turkish-speaking healthcare professionals.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMC Nursing
Published
2025-10-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12912-025-03992-z
Primary Topic
Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the Regret Intensity Scale

Aysel Özsaban, Şengül Üzen Cura, Ela Yılmaz Coşkun
BMC Nursing
Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
article

Validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the Regret Intensity Scale

Aysel Özsaban, Şengül Üzen Cura, Ela Yılmaz Coşkun
article en

Abstract

This study aimed to evaluate the validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the Regret Intensity Scale, which assesses the regret experienced by nurses during the care process. This methodological study was conducted with 402 nurses. Data were collected using the Nurse Information Form, Regret Intensity Scale and Elements of Regret Scale. Language and content validity were assessed using the Content Validity Index. Construct validity was examined through exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses. Cronbach’s alpha coefficient, item-total score correlation, and Pearson correlation coefficient were used to assess reliability. Exploratory factor analysis (n = 193) showed a KMO value of 0.890 and a Bartlett’s test value of 1466.942 (p < 0.001). Factor loadings of the single-factor structure ranged from 0.737 to 0.865. Confirmatory factor analysis (n = 209) indicated good model fit (χ2/df = 2.338, RMSEA = 0.079, GFI = 0.95). The Cronbach’s alpha coefficient of the scale was 0.932 and all items ranged from 0.927 to 0.934. A statistically significant correlation was found with the Elements of Regret Scale (r = 0.490; p < 0.001). The Turkish version of the Regret Intensity Scale is a valid and reliable instrument for measuring the regret experienced by nurses in care processes. It is a practical tool for use in clinical practice and research to assess care-related regret in Turkish-speaking healthcare professionals.

BMC NursingVol. 24(1)
Çanakkale Onsekiz Mart Üniversitesi (TR), Tekirdağ Namık Kemal University (TR), Karadeniz Technical University (TR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 64%
Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.