MRI-based Habitat Analysis for the Prediction of Progression-Free Survival in Primary Spinal Tumors

Background Prediction of prognosis in patients with primary spinal tumors is critical for treatment planning but a clinical challenge. Purpose To develop an MRI-based nested habitat radiomics model to predict progression-free survival (PFS) in patients with primary spinal tumors. Materials and Methods This dual-center retrospective study analyzed patients with resected primary spinal tumors. Patients from March 2010 to August 2019 were assigned to a training set; from September 2019 to October 2022, to an internal test set; and from March 2010 to October 2022, to an external test set. Whole-tumor regions of interest were delineated on T1- and T2-weighted MRI scans. Nested habitat radiomic analysis was performed to locate aggressive subregions associated with a poorer prognosis. Initially, a support vector machine model classified tumors based on global features. Then, local radiomics features were extracted to generate probability maps to identify aggressive tumor subregions with use of <i>k</i>-means clustering. Features from tumor microregions with the highest probability were used to build a final habitat model. Performance was evaluated using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) and Kaplan-Meier survival analysis. Results Among 259 patients (median age, 39 years [IQR, 28-53 years]; 150 female), the habitat model better predicted PFS compared with the whole-tumor radiomics model (AUC [training set], 0.93 [95% CI: 0.87, 0.98] vs 0.82 [95% CI: 0.68, 0.93]; <i>P</i> = .03, DeLong test). The habitat model combined with clinical characteristics showed the best performance (AUC [training set], 0.95 [95% CI: 0.88, 0.99]; AUC [internal test set], 0.86 [95% CI: 0.69, 0.96]; AUC [external test set], 0.89 [95% CI: 0.76, 0.96]). The nested habitat radiomics score was an independent risk factor for 3-year PFS (high- vs low-risk group PFS: 24 vs 28 months; log-rank <i>P</i> = .04) in the external test dataset. Conclusion In patients with primary spinal tumors, an MRI-based nested habitat radiomics model outperformed other models in predicting PFS. © RSNA, 2025 <i>Supplemental material is available for this article.</i> See also the editorial by Jabehdar Maralani and Burgess in this issue.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Radiology
Published
2025-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.242993
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Radiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.72
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

MRI-based Habitat Analysis for the Prediction of Progression-Free Survival in Primary Spinal Tumors

Ning Lang, Yongye Chen, Min‐Ying Su, Tongyu Wang et al.
2 citations
Radiology
Radiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging
2.72
article

MRI-based Habitat Analysis for the Prediction of Progression-Free Survival in Primary Spinal Tumors

Ning Lang, Yongye Chen, Min‐Ying Su, Tongyu Wang, Weili Zhao, Dapeng Hao, Qizheng Wang, Ruixin Yan, Yang Zhang, Ke Liu
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Background Prediction of prognosis in patients with primary spinal tumors is critical for treatment planning but a clinical challenge. Purpose To develop an MRI-based nested habitat radiomics model to predict progression-free survival (PFS) in patients with primary spinal tumors. Materials and Methods This dual-center retrospective study analyzed patients with resected primary spinal tumors. Patients from March 2010 to August 2019 were assigned to a training set; from September 2019 to October 2022, to an internal test set; and from March 2010 to October 2022, to an external test set. Whole-tumor regions of interest were delineated on T1- and T2-weighted MRI scans. Nested habitat radiomic analysis was performed to locate aggressive subregions associated with a poorer prognosis. Initially, a support vector machine model classified tumors based on global features. Then, local radiomics features were extracted to generate probability maps to identify aggressive tumor subregions with use of <i>k</i>-means clustering. Features from tumor microregions with the highest probability were used to build a final habitat model. Performance was evaluated using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) and Kaplan-Meier survival analysis. Results Among 259 patients (median age, 39 years [IQR, 28-53 years]; 150 female), the habitat model better predicted PFS compared with the whole-tumor radiomics model (AUC [training set], 0.93 [95% CI: 0.87, 0.98] vs 0.82 [95% CI: 0.68, 0.93]; <i>P</i> = .03, DeLong test). The habitat model combined with clinical characteristics showed the best performance (AUC [training set], 0.95 [95% CI: 0.88, 0.99]; AUC [internal test set], 0.86 [95% CI: 0.69, 0.96]; AUC [external test set], 0.89 [95% CI: 0.76, 0.96]). The nested habitat radiomics score was an independent risk factor for 3-year PFS (high- vs low-risk group PFS: 24 vs 28 months; log-rank <i>P</i> = .04) in the external test dataset. Conclusion In patients with primary spinal tumors, an MRI-based nested habitat radiomics model outperformed other models in predicting PFS. © RSNA, 2025 <i>Supplemental material is available for this article.</i> See also the editorial by Jabehdar Maralani and Burgess in this issue.

RadiologyVol. 317(1)
Qingdao University (CN), Kaohsiung Medical University (TW), Peking University (CN), University of California, Irvine (US), Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University (CN), Peking University Third Hospital (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Radiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging
2.72
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.