Microbond data analysis: comparative assessment of different approaches to determine IFSS

Abstract Studies on fiber surface modifications typically utilize micromechanical characterization methods, such as microbond tests, to assess the adhesion of a resin on a fiber. The fiber surface is thought to cause the majority of the deviation seen in the data since the surface treatment methods rarely produce uniform surfaces on all treated fibers. A realistic number of droplets must be tested to achieve reliable and statistically significant data of the fiber-matrix interface. Therefore, it is crucial to understand how the interfacial shear strength (IFSS) behaves as a function of the dataset size. An extensive microbond data analysis was conducted for a dataset consisting of approximately 1600 epoxy droplets on a commercial glass fiber (based on 53 filaments). The IFSS was calculated using three approaches to evaluate how each IFSS value behaves as a function of increasing dataset size. It was evident that the droplet’s embedded area has a significant effect on the apparent IFSS, which is troublesome if the deposited resin volume and thus the droplet size distribution cannot be controlled well during sample manufacturing. According to the results, linear regression based IFSS should be preferred but apparent IFSS may be used for comparative analysis. However, the linear regression method where a single fit is made to the whole dataset requires a high number of filaments to provide reliable results.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
IOP Conference Series Materials Science and Engineering
Published
2025-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899x/1338/1/012021
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Epoxy Resin Curing Processes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.39
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Microbond data analysis: comparative assessment of different approaches to determine IFSS

Essi Sarlin, JA Savolainen
1 citations
IOP Conference Series Materials Science and Engineering
Epoxy Resin Curing Processes
3.39
article

Microbond data analysis: comparative assessment of different approaches to determine IFSS

Essi Sarlin, JA Savolainen
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract Studies on fiber surface modifications typically utilize micromechanical characterization methods, such as microbond tests, to assess the adhesion of a resin on a fiber. The fiber surface is thought to cause the majority of the deviation seen in the data since the surface treatment methods rarely produce uniform surfaces on all treated fibers. A realistic number of droplets must be tested to achieve reliable and statistically significant data of the fiber-matrix interface. Therefore, it is crucial to understand how the interfacial shear strength (IFSS) behaves as a function of the dataset size. An extensive microbond data analysis was conducted for a dataset consisting of approximately 1600 epoxy droplets on a commercial glass fiber (based on 53 filaments). The IFSS was calculated using three approaches to evaluate how each IFSS value behaves as a function of increasing dataset size. It was evident that the droplet’s embedded area has a significant effect on the apparent IFSS, which is troublesome if the deposited resin volume and thus the droplet size distribution cannot be controlled well during sample manufacturing. According to the results, linear regression based IFSS should be preferred but apparent IFSS may be used for comparative analysis. However, the linear regression method where a single fit is made to the whole dataset requires a high number of filaments to provide reliable results.

IOP Conference Series Materials Science and EngineeringVol. 1338(1)
Tampere University (FI)
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Epoxy Resin Curing Processes
3.39
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.