Cause of Shock‐Associated Substorm Activity on 24 September 1998: A Global MHD Simulation Study

Abstract We investigated the shock‐triggered substorm activity that occurred on 24 September 1998. Results from a global magnetohydrodynamic simulation show that the interplanetary shock immediately triggered substorm activity characterized by a sharp intensification of the auroral electrojets and widespread auroral brightening, which are consistent with observations. In the simulation, the following processes occur: When the interplanetary shock struck the magnetopause, compressional waves were excited. As the compressional waves propagated antisunward, the plasma pressure increased in the magnetosphere, leading to enhanced ionospheric conductivity. Almost simultaneously, field‐aligned currents (FACs) were intensified, particularly on the dayside, resulting in stronger ionospheric convection. The combination of enhanced conductivity and convection rapidly intensified the auroral electrojet. During this interval, the z ‐component of the interplanetary magnetic field was nearly zero, while the y ‐component was largely enhanced, producing a substantial increase in the convection. In contrast to classical substorms, several typical features were absent, including auroral bulges or surges, localized enhancement of FACs near midnight, and clear dipolarization in the near‐Earth tail. Despite these differences, the shock‐triggered substorm activity may represent a distinct subclass of substorms, driven primarily by direct solar wind forcing. Notably, magnetic reconnection in the near‐Earth tail had already occurred prior to the shock arrival, but we could not identify a clear role of the reconnection in the subsequent substorm activity. Of course, the possibility of unloading processes cannot be entirely ruled out. The nature of shock‐triggered substorm activity remains open to discussion, and further detailed observational studies are needed to clarify this issue.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Geophysical Research Space Physics
Published
2025-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1029/2025ja034636
Primary Topic
Ionosphere and magnetosphere dynamics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Cause of Shock‐Associated Substorm Activity on 24 September 1998: A Global MHD Simulation Study

Takashi Tanaka, Yusuke Ebihara
Journal of Geophysical Research Space Physics
Ionosphere and magnetosphere dynamics
article

Cause of Shock‐Associated Substorm Activity on 24 September 1998: A Global MHD Simulation Study

Takashi Tanaka, Yusuke Ebihara
article en

Abstract

Abstract We investigated the shock‐triggered substorm activity that occurred on 24 September 1998. Results from a global magnetohydrodynamic simulation show that the interplanetary shock immediately triggered substorm activity characterized by a sharp intensification of the auroral electrojets and widespread auroral brightening, which are consistent with observations. In the simulation, the following processes occur: When the interplanetary shock struck the magnetopause, compressional waves were excited. As the compressional waves propagated antisunward, the plasma pressure increased in the magnetosphere, leading to enhanced ionospheric conductivity. Almost simultaneously, field‐aligned currents (FACs) were intensified, particularly on the dayside, resulting in stronger ionospheric convection. The combination of enhanced conductivity and convection rapidly intensified the auroral electrojet. During this interval, the z ‐component of the interplanetary magnetic field was nearly zero, while the y ‐component was largely enhanced, producing a substantial increase in the convection. In contrast to classical substorms, several typical features were absent, including auroral bulges or surges, localized enhancement of FACs near midnight, and clear dipolarization in the near‐Earth tail. Despite these differences, the shock‐triggered substorm activity may represent a distinct subclass of substorms, driven primarily by direct solar wind forcing. Notably, magnetic reconnection in the near‐Earth tail had already occurred prior to the shock arrival, but we could not identify a clear role of the reconnection in the subsequent substorm activity. Of course, the possibility of unloading processes cannot be entirely ruled out. The nature of shock‐triggered substorm activity remains open to discussion, and further detailed observational studies are needed to clarify this issue.

Journal of Geophysical Research Space PhysicsVol. 130(10)
Kyushu University (JP), Kyoto University (JP)
Openalex Percentile: Top 78%
Ionosphere and magnetosphere dynamics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.